Alex Tanguay a Montreal Canadien
-
According to several sources the Canadiens have acquired Alex Tanguay in exchange for their 25th pick and a second round pick in 2009.
Thoughts?
Related
The Canadiens surprised everyone today by selecting goaltender Carey Price at #5.
The first goalie to go in the draft, who himsel...
There have been substantial changes to the Montreal Canadiens since they last
competed in the 2006 Playoffs. Montrealers believe their...
Montreal has re-signed skilled forward Alex Kovalev. The deal is over 4 years at 4.5 million a year.
The general consensus was Kov...
There are currently no tags for this post.
187 Comments
ShoutBox
Last Message 6 hours, 15 minutes ago
5 guests are online. Google is crawling the site.
- goalie : I can't type.... what a faux pas on my behalf...
- goalie : I just realized what I said adn didn't say yesterday. What a fayx as on my behalf. Regarding coaching Randy Cunnyworth MUSDT stay as an assistant- he deserves at least that after the tremendous job he did in the latter part of this past season. I'd still mlike to have Robinson, Carbo adn Allard on the staff also.
- Avatar37 : I agree Senet, my choice if we can't have Cunneyworth would be Crawford, Robinson on defense, Cunneyworth for offense, and Carbo as offense/faceoffs .
- Senet1 : I think if I had my choice it would be Crawford and see if he could get Carbo and Robinson as assistants. That would be my idea coaching team.
- goalie : I witnesed Marc Crawford MANY times when the Avs, etc. played against Oilers and let me tell you - he is constantly on the referees asses virtually game after game. He is the complete OPPOSITE of J. Martin. Crawford is calm on TSN but he is one excited coach behind the bench. A friend of mine who was an NHL linesman for 26 years said they dreaded Crawford he was so tough on the officials!
- goalie : You know, I've bee thinking about the coaching situation. I'd be really excited if the Habs had Hartley as head coach and Carbo adn Robinson as his assistants. I also read it somewhere about a month ago that Toronto's goalie coach Allard (?) wants to relocate back to Montreal where he has his goaltending school/business. Add him to the mix and I'd say the Habs would be in great shape coaching wise.
- Avatar37 : Well, from what I recall, Hartley didn't do all that well with the Thrashers. But, I don't know enough about him to judge one way or the other. Crawford I do know, and he always seemed to be a good, level headed coach to me.
- Senet1 : even Pacioretty two years ago did not impress any of us. Younger players have to play and make mistakes and learn from those mistakes. If they sit in the press box they are learning nothing.
- Senet1 : Of course if he have some good assistants like a Larry Robinson to teach the young defence and someone like Carbo to teach faceoffs etc. then your coach does not have to be as good at teaching. If Hartley fits the bill you get no argument from me. My only previous point is that if he is impatient with your younger players to the point that he does not play them, then we are right back where we were with Martin. Martin was a good coach too, but how he handled Emelin, PK and even Pacioretty two
- goalie : I would like to see the Habs sign a coach who realizes that our team isn't tough enough (we need to get bigger and somewhat more nastier),the coach needs t be a great TEACHER and be a coach who can get the players to understand and buy into his system. Other than that I couldn't care what lingo he speaks. I wnat to see our team become a ligitimate contender fast!
- HabsLoseAgain : Well we dont know if he is or is not a teaching coach. I woukd just hate to paint Hartley something that he is not. There will always be questions but if Hartley was hired as the habs new bench boss i for one would not be overly upset.
- Senet1 : My thoughts are not that he is or is not a good coach but rather that when he won the cup he had an experience team of superstars on that team. Where as we have a group of young inexperienced players, is he a teaching coach or a tactical coach or both? I am not question whether he is a good coach, but my question therefore is he the coach for us at this point in the deveopment of our team?? Not sure we are all purely speculating at the moment?
- Senet1 : Something happened to my first post. I will try again.
- Senet1 : That is why I said I am not sure he is the coach for us at this time? Right now we are all speculating including yourself, because non of us know for sure?
- HabsLoseAgain : Crawford also won a cup with Patrick Roy so would you say he is a good coach or did he just have great players and one of the best goaltenders of alltime?
- HabsLoseAgain : Senrt so please give me some reasons why you think Hartley is not the coach the habs need right now. What is it that you do not like about him or his coaching style?
- HabsLoseAgain : Well all great coaches had great players playing for them so i guess you you add a a pile of other coaches to that list including Bowan......
- Senet1 : Hartley, was he a good coach or did he just have great players and one of the best altime goaltenders of all time. I am not sure that he is the type of coach that this organization needs right now. Unless of course we sign a ton of free agents.
- Avatar37 : However, my feelings may completely be wrong, Hartley may turn out to be a good fit.
- Avatar37 : I didn't say Hartley was unknown, I said we demoted a good coach in Cunneyworth and now have an unknown quantity because we don't have a coach. I don't have that great a feeling about Hartley, I'd be much more comfortable with Crawford.
- HabsLoseAgain : In my opinion i think he might be a good fit in montreal. Oh and he also likes to have a tough team.
- HabsLoseAgain : Also this year he coached the ZSC Lions to the swiss championship title.
- HabsLoseAgain : lol the so called "unknown" won a cup in 2000-2001 with the colarado avalanch.
- HabsLoseAgain : lol Bob Hartley is not an unknown lol.....sheesh.
- Senet1 : I think he has until the trading deadline to show us that he deserves to be on this team. If he does not get back on track then he could be simply a 2nd round draft pick to whoever we can trade him to.
- Avatar37 : Bourque reminds me of Pouliot, size, skill, and invisible. He needs to get back to playing a physical game and bang people around and maybe he'll start getting some of those garbage goals again. Need to get to the front of the net. I hope he can find his game again.
- Avatar37 : We had a good coach in Randy Cunneyworth. Now we have an unknown, with Bob Hartley rumoured to be the front runner. I'd rather have Cunneyworth.
- goalie : A player like Rene Bourwue has al the physical attributes of what would be a beter than average player. Hwever, he certainly didn't play that well especially after being in Montreal about three weeks. We NEED players like Rene to play hard AND produce points on a REGULAR BASIS in order for us to be competitive.
- Senet1 : MONTREAL – Rene Bourque had a rocky start to his career as a Hab, but he’s planning on using the next four years to make up for it. After arriving in Montreal under less-than-ideal circumstances in January, Bourque spent the following 38 games hoping to find the spark he needed to rekindle his offensive production. Despite flanking Tomas Plekanec on the team’s second line to close out the season, the 30-year-old sniper suddenly found himself firing blanks in his new NHL home.
- Senet1 : I think we have to be patient and not expect too much too soon. Let's get a strong management team in place, make a good choices in the draft get a good coach and then see what we need at the free agent market. I will not be too disapointed if we miss the playoffs again next year if it means a long term team success. We have the opportunity to make some major strides over the next two years at the draft table. Then we fill in the holes.
- goalie : I certainly agree that we need to get some impact forwards who will sign for 5 years, not for a season then walk away. That's not going to help us.
- goalie : I wouldn't trade PK for Ovetchkin no matter what. He is a coach's NIGHTMARE and a poor team player.
- Senet1 : I believe he will as we graducally put better players around him and build this team.
- Senet1 : Goalie I agree with Avatar. PK is the present and future of this teams defence. I would not even take Staal from Pittsburg unless I had him tied up in a long term contract of a Minimum of 5 years. Also once has to consider the salary difference. Pk is on the move up probably 3M plus for his next contract and then eventually 4-5M if he keeps on improving. He has moved his game up two gears since he came into the league 2 years ago. He now has to move to the next level and I believe he will as w
- Avatar37 : pressure playing in Montreal, since he has problems with the expectations in Washington and Montreal isn't any easier. Then again, the media were very easy on Kovalev, so maybe it's a Russian thing? No idea. Anyway, yeah, it would have to be an established star that gives us an immediate drastic upgrade at forward, that's the only way I'd trade PK, because we'd be giving up a potential QB on our blueline for the next decade.
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


June 25, 2008 at 5:00 pm
umm guys, sorry but they’re just qualifying offers. So they can still be claimed, but It makes it alot more easier.
June 25, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Lats is the biggest waste of space on the Habs roster. Sure he can put the odd puck in the net, but look at his goals. His linemates do all the work and he’s fortunate enough to bury an easy one. He skates like he’s on concrete and uses his body way less than the much smaller s.kost. He’s only there because of his potential and the french media. Guimauvre Latalentless is a plug.
As for Sundin, I don’t see it happening, I wish he would be he’s gonna end up testing the market. Laracque would be a definite step towards upgrading our team for the playoffs and adding that toughness so that the opposition doesn’t always go after Komi, who we need to play healthy.
If Sundin and Hossa don’t pan out, Selanne would be a nice compliment to our team as well. Koivu, get ready to sway you buddy…
June 25, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Alias, in my statement that you quoted, I was NOT saying the Habs do not need tough physical players, but was responding to Senet suggesting Sundin should be that kind of player. I was merely pointing out that using Sundin to stand in front of the net and take abuse would be doing a huge disservice to Mats and his immense talents. For that role, all you have to do is sign a policeman/fighter type of journeyman player. The “Flying Frenchmen”, or more accurately “The Flying Europeans”, got pushed around way too much last year. The Canadiens need a tough physical forward up front, even if he just sits on the bench most of the time. And as I said, Laraque is the toughest guy that is currently available. Bob Gainey, are you listening????
June 25, 2008 at 7:36 pm
guys we’ll work it out. gainey definetly has something up his sleeve
June 25, 2008 at 7:39 pm
And while I am on a roll with the GMs, let me say this: Thanks a lot, Serge Savard, for decimating our beloved Habs, a year after they won the Cup. You traded away Momesso, LeClair, Chelios, Claude Lemieux, and on and on and on. Savard was THE WORST General Manager in the storied history of the Montreal Canadiens. We made a step in the right direction by bringing back Bob Gainey, but another of my pet peeves is how we never retained the great Larry Robinson, in my mind the best defenceman to ever suit up for the Habs, and in his prime one of the top 5 to ever play the game. He was the heart and the backbone of those 4 Stanley Cup winning teams in Montreal. It took us 20 years to even retire his jersey — what a sham!
June 25, 2008 at 7:40 pm
hey, by the way, anyone seen HB lately?
June 25, 2008 at 7:41 pm
no gainey fits more then robinson for sure
June 25, 2008 at 7:41 pm
you still on RD?
June 25, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Lets make one thing perfectly clear, I never said Sundin should stand in front of the net, I never said he was not tough. I said he is best suited as a perimeter player which is what he is and has always been. Yes he will go to the net for a rebound and that is where is toughness come in but he does address one thing a need for a front line centreman who has size. He does not address the short comings of our offense nor does he change the deminsion of our offense that we already have, he just makes it better because of his talent. However, if we are going to win he have to have a power forward who will address that other deminsion of offense that we did not have this year in the playoffs. I do not know how I can make my point any clearer.
June 25, 2008 at 10:08 pm
Well I for one would not sign Laracque, I do not see him providing that much help for us. Who is he going to replace on the top three lines? Therefore, he is on the fourth line getting maybe 10 minutes a game. What we need is someone who can fit into our powerplay, has enough skill to put the puck in the net and crash the net when needed. Some who has the skill to play the powerplay on the first or second line. In otherword a someone that you do not mind paying $3M+. Laracque provides muscle but also will hurt us by taking undisciplined penalties. Something we do not need and can ill afford in the new NHL.
June 25, 2008 at 10:37 pm
Here is some interesting new Streit was our third leading point getting for the season. Now that tells me that he was hurting in the playoffs. As I said earlier, same injury as Komy yet he only sat out one week. Komy on month and still was not right when he returned? Think about it?
June 25, 2008 at 10:46 pm
Worst GM? MY idea of the worst GM goes back to the 80′s when we still had a great team just not quite good enough to win the cup. Grundman 1978 to 1983 traded away Langway and a host of other good players and our draft picks were the worst at a time when we should have been drafting very well. Serge did make some bad moves later in his GM days but he did build the team back up from disaster between 1983 to 1993 with some good draft picks and we did win a cup under his leadership. Unfortunately the pressure got to him the following year when we missed the playoffs and he paniced and made some bad trades in an attempt to improve us but none of the trades really worked all that well.
My vote goes to Grundman.
June 25, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Senet, how do you know Streit had exactly the same injury as Komasarev, are you the trainer for the team? Even if the injury was similar, how do you know the extent of the injury in either case? Different players react differently to injury, including many factors such as body type, family history, pain tolerance, precise location of injury, its acutenss, whether it happened before, etc. If you like Streit, just leave it at that, don’t try to rationalize his poor play in the playoffs by pretending to be a medical doctor.
Secondly, in my post I was answering Alias, not you. I have already told you I am not interested in discussing the point with you any further, so why do you persist? If anyone had the slightest interest in what either one of us thinks about Sundin’s game, they can go back for themselves and read what we wrote. So let it go, you sound like a broken record.
June 26, 2008 at 9:45 am
guys Streit did suck in the playoffs,, but are u saying trade Markov also? Sreit might not be that fancy but he is an awesome hockey player. I doubt he was that injured, but I don’t think he needs an excuse. All habs except for Brisbebois and KOivu didn’t play as well as planned. If we traded away all of our player that sucked in the playoffs, the team would be one. It was pretty much Streit’s 1st playoffs because he didn’t make the playoff roster in 06. If Streit re-Signs we’ll be great. I mean this guy had like 62 pts or something as a 4th liner or a 6th defencemen. imagine if he played with Kovalev all season 90 pts?
June 26, 2008 at 11:30 am
NHL TEAM PREDICTIONS lol
1.Montreal 1.Detroit
2.Pittsburgh 2.Anaheim
3.Washington 3.Calgary
4.Philedlphia 4.Dallas
5.NewYork R 5.Sanjose
6.Ottawa 6.Nashville
7.NewJersey 7.Edmonton
8.Buffalo 8.Minnesota
9.Carolina 9.Phoenix
10.Boston 10.Colorado
11.New York I 11.Columbus
12.Tampa Bay 12.Chicago
13.Florida 13.Vancouver
14.Toronto 14.Los Angelas
15.Atlanta 15.St.Louis
June 27, 2008 at 7:47 am
Montreal has 15 Mill to spend now because of the cap limit gonig up. spend 7 Mill on re signing the young guns and then fo after a 3rd Centremen!
June 27, 2008 at 9:33 am
STUO 11:
“Our guys didn’t get in front of the net because they were too young to know what it was all about”.
I do not agree with this.
It is the Coaches job to tell these Guys to go to the net and park there Asses there!
June 27, 2008 at 11:24 am
lol yeah, but those players went in front of the net in the season without the coach telling them. It was the coaches problem also though but come on, this year every one will be ready! u might think I’m stupid for saying this but I would offer Ryder 1 Mill to come back for 1 more season, just to see how he does, but he wouldn’t accept.
June 27, 2008 at 2:10 pm
I don’t think Ryder would come back for 5 mil a year. Ryder has a sour taste in his mouth now. He would take a lot less money to sign else where.
The way that The Habs handled Ryder was terrible.
June 27, 2008 at 2:34 pm
actually, it’s Ryder’s attitude that was terrible! Imagine making paper airplanes and goofing around during a habs playoff game. shameful!
June 27, 2008 at 2:39 pm
guys too harsh on ryder
June 27, 2008 at 2:41 pm
he is the reason we beat the rangers in that 5-0 game u know.(3 goals! or 2 goals and 1 assist)
June 27, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Who’s harsh on Ryder?
Not I.
Carbonneau sat Ryder out. Was he supposed to sit there, cry & whimper. NO !!
Ryder showed alot of class through it all.
Not one complaint Buddy. Not One…….
June 27, 2008 at 4:22 pm
I see the Ducks placed Todd Bertuzzi on waivers. I think we should go after him, he would do very well in Montreal playing with all our skill guys. A few years ago he was the best power forward in the game, and he’s still only 33. He would be a step up from Laraque — almost as tough, and a much better hockey player.
June 27, 2008 at 4:45 pm
Here’s the latest on Sundin:
http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/16838-Leafs-captain-Mats-Sundin-continues-to-deliberate-as-clock-ticks.html
June 27, 2008 at 5:31 pm
San Jose wants to clean their room out. Maybe we should get Craig Rivet back? he’s 3.5 Mill and San Jose wants to free up some cap space.
June 27, 2008 at 10:24 pm
I’d give Ryan Malone, 4-5 mill to play here. He’d be a great addition to our team and it looks as though he may not be back in Pitts. His points weren;t that great but he notched more goals than Ryder and he’s physical. Basically a Tom Kost with more skill. What do ya think?
June 28, 2008 at 6:27 am
I think Malone would suck *** because I haven’t seen anything from him. He basically gets the points from malkin. The guy is good at shoveling garbage in front of the net though. But he won’t do too good here I’m expecting 30-40 pts. so 5 Mill(more than Kovalev) for the 30 pts like player Malone. If u think he’s better than Kovalev go ahead, but I rather pay 6 Mill for Rolston.
June 28, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Radical Dude: You are right, I do not know how serious Striet’s injury was, all we know is what we were told and that is it was the same as Komy’s. I just would not give up on him so quickly, he was our third leading point getting. Anyway, it seems you and I don’t agree on much, I respect your opinion I just wish you would respect mine as well as other without making personal comments.
Here’s something I do agree with you about and that would be that Bertuzzi would be an improvement of Laracque. However, I am not so sure we need his legal problems.
June 28, 2008 at 8:53 pm
Malone is trade to Tampa according to the new tonight?
June 28, 2008 at 9:09 pm
Sorry Malone and Roberts not traded just yet it was their rights to sign to Tampa
June 28, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Meanwhile, RDS also reports defenseman Mark Streit hasn’t received an offer yet from the Canadiens.
It’s believed the Habs are waiting until the Sundin situation resolves itself, one way or another, before making an offer to Streit.
June 29, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Marc Denis said that he would love to sign with his home club(mtl). lol but he sucks. Maybe he would be better with the habs, but I would only sign him for 0.900 Mill max! Instead of getting Sundin I say we go after Rolston. Sundin will be probably 7 Mill and Rolston, because of his bad season last year he will only be about 5 to 6 Mill
June 29, 2008 at 8:06 pm
How bout if all fails with Sundin we reunite the line of Naslund and Bertuzzi with one of our yongins like Stewart or minikosti or Lapierre? Or a Vet like Saku…?
June 29, 2008 at 9:47 pm
lol Tampa Bay is signing Malone for a 7 year deadl worth 8 Mill the first 2 seasons and 4.5 Mill the other two seasons lol I would pay this guy more than 3 Mill!!!!
June 29, 2008 at 9:47 pm
(wouldn’t) lol
June 29, 2008 at 10:07 pm
I can’t wait to see his (Malone’s) numbers next year. 7 mill!!! He better score 90+ pts for that kind of money.
June 29, 2008 at 11:07 pm
LOL Bolts completely overpaid for Malone, he’s worth 2.5/3 mill MAX. I’m not sure
how much money the habs have to spend but i’d rather sign Kostistyn for 3-4 million for 3 years or something than pay 7 mill fo Sundin for one year and lose Kostitsyn. Also i think its smarter to sign Rolston to a multiyear contract then have Sundin for 1 year.
June 30, 2008 at 8:37 am
yeah but guys, now they have Rolston!He could sign some where else, but knowing Tampa they’ll sign him for about 9 Mill lol. and Now Roberts. I think Tampa Bay is going 1st in the southeast 3rd in the conference, but don’t worry, the bolts are no threat to the habs.
June 30, 2008 at 8:38 am
oh yeah and my new video MONTREAL CANADIENS 2008-2009 SEASON PREVIEW is already out on youtube.(STUO11)
June 30, 2008 at 8:59 am
Well I think Gainey should start looking at other ufa’s because it’s not looking to good for Sundin coming. He was supposed to make up his mind yesterday and didn’t. Now Rolston is pretty much a goner. All the better players are being snatched up while we wait on Sundin. But I’m sure Gainey has a plan. Well I hope so anyways.
June 30, 2008 at 10:16 am
Rolston, Sundin or Hossa, NOT comming to Montreal. NOT going to happen!
Bertuzzi! That piece of **** should never be playing in the NHL after what he done. Yet alone, to play for Montreal.
Montreal got Tanguay. They are lucky to get him.
No top Player will come to Montreal this year.
You Guys can What If, hope and pray all you want………… NOT GOING TO HAPPEN !!!!!!!!!!!!1
June 30, 2008 at 11:46 am
I disagree. I think that Sundin is going to retire or play for Montreal. Sundin told Fletcher it’s the only team he pcture himself with either than the leafs. Since Sundin was a hab fan growing up as a kid.
June 30, 2008 at 11:55 am
Don’t believe everything you read. If he really wanted to play here, he would already be signed.
June 30, 2008 at 12:26 pm
He probably hates Montreal. But It’s taking him a while because he knows It’s his best chance to win the cup. Detroit is great but they just won it last year and they won’t have the passion the habs will this year. Carey Price 4 VEZINA!!!!
June 30, 2008 at 5:13 pm
considering the fact that this is THE HABS YEAR(centennial), Gainey has done little to emphasize that point. Gainey should take a lesson, from TB, on how to be aggressive. Imagine if Gainey could show that same pursuit for players? we would actually have a stanley cup contender! KUDOS TO TB! I wish the habs were more like them! I’m frustrated on how little effort Gainey made.Why didn’t he secure signing right to a FEW players like TB did? Forget Sundin, lost cause. We weren’t able to sign him. I bet TB will sign him!
June 30, 2008 at 5:47 pm
lol
June 30, 2008 at 5:47 pm
i agree with post #143
June 30, 2008 at 8:09 pm
So you wish Montreal was more like Tampa? Hmm, well they did get the #1 pick this year because thye sucked ***, they over spent on Malone (7 million, r u kidding?), they signed Gary Roberts who is 43 frickin’ years old, and they have no goaltending. Okay they’ve been aggressive so far this off season, but don’t slam Gainey for not acting like them, no one is acting as desperate as they are, jumping on anything that skates. Bob has built this team from the ground up, we are contenders not pretenders!
June 30, 2008 at 9:18 pm
Well we’re on the eve of free agency, it will be interesting to see what happens. Hopefully BG has something big up his sleeve.