Andrei Markov signs 4 year $23 Million Deal
-
Andrei Markov has signed a 4 year contract that will pay him $23 Million.
First thoughts…..Big Bucks.
Markov has grown into an elite player in the NHL and without doubt the Canadiens best defenseman. Elite defenseman have big price tags. Getting Markov inked was the most important priority the Habs faced this off-season.
Imagine a Habs defense without Markov and it’s not a pretty thought…
Is $23 Million too much for Guy Carbonneau’s “General”? Time will tell.
The next logical thought is that there is little or no money available to sign Sheldon Souray. Bob Gainey may already know that Sheldon Souray is a goner. He’s long been rumored to be on the way out and if it wasn’t already decided, the $23 million dollars less to spend might seal it.
Related
The Canadiens filled another hole in their roster this week signing Jan Bulis to a one year deal.
Bulis spent last y...
In 2004-05, he registered 23 points in 42 games (7 goals, 16 assists) with the Moscow Dynamo in the Russian League. He scored two g...
Earlier this week I mentioned that it Jose Theodore was going to be signed by Friday. Today, just that has happend.
What...
There are currently no tags for this post.
25 Comments
ShoutBox
Last Message 38 minutes ago
3 guests are online.
- goalie : In all fairness to AK...he has played more aggressively and has been more involved the last 5 games or so. Amazing what UFA does to a player. If we could get 25+ goals plus a consistent effort I would want him on my team. His biggest downside is his inconsistency to be involved in the play.
- Senet1 : Also the addition of Blunden and even Leblanc is not shy to throwing body checks. Also PK has been more aggressive lately
- Senet1 : That is partly because of the change in coaching styles and the addition of Bourque.
- Senet1 : If we kept Plekanec and Bourgue then we need a shooter on that line. So to me from a forward standpoint we need to add a goal scorer, but one who goes to the net and is not knocked around. To me based on our offence this year that is the most needed position to fill on our forward lines. When you consider that we got ride of Cammy, and if we trade Gionta and Gomez disappears we are no longer a small team. The team has more grit now than at the first of the year.
- Senet1 : So we have to add some muscle as well as skill to our second & third lines and upgrade our fourth line as well. I could see Leblanc moving in as the centre on the second line if we got something good Plekanecs, otherwise, he could play the wing on either the second or third line. Blunden seemed to score faily well in the AHL not sure if he has it in him but would like to seem him on a line with Eller and maybe Leblanc next year all three players like to use their bodies and therefore should be
- Senet1 : Not counting Markov if he plays. If we trade or let go of our UFA defenceman then we will need at least three D-men, I would like a good look at Nash to see if he can play at this level. If not he is gone, I do not think any of our other defensive prospects are ready quite yet. Our junior and college players should be coming on stream for Hamilton next year so we will get to see how much they have developed and whether any are ready for the big time.
- Senet1 : While I agree we have quite a few players that could be made available, I do not see a need to make wholesale changes only the necessary one. obviously Gomez, Gionta, AK46(if he will not sign) I keep our top line of Cole, Pacman and David. I keep Eller and Leblanc, Blunden, Bourque, probably Plecanec unless we can really improve on his positin. I keep PK, Emelin, Gorges, Diaz and Naturally Price. Probably Budaj. That basically gives us two functional line and two sets of defence, not counting
- goalie : Great to see Pacs gets su=ome success after the devestating dirty check last season that could have paralyzed him for life.
- goalie : Given ho the team has played this season one thing in our favor is that we pretty much need to clean house. Other than about 6-7 guys everyone else would be available in my mind.
- goalie : After how the tes]am has
- Avatar37 : Apparently only one offer for Carter on the low side so far, I think Montreal would be foolish not to investigate the possibility of a trade for him, and if there is low interest, the deal might be able to include moving Gomez. Gomez/Darche/Cam poli and a third round pick? Maybe not, but I'd be in serious talks with Columbus right about now.
- Avatar37 : «link»
- Avatar37 : for him had we held on to him until now and created a bidding war. There are more buyers than sellers currently on the market and it would have been the perfect time to have traded him.
- Avatar37 : Goalie - I'm not sure how we could have obtained more for Halak. We showcased him, everyone knew he was available for trade, and in the end, we took the best offer. Any asset is only worth what a purchaser will pay for it. The Halak trade wasn't like the Cammalleri trade where you had GMs afterwards saying they didn't even know he was on the market. The Halak trade was done properly, the Cammelleri trade was a knee-jerk panic move, and while my opinion is that we could have received more
- Avatar37 : I saw the game, the Islanders first goal came from a shot that was clearly above the height of the crossbar. How is it possible for a play to go to review where they have the advantage of mulitple camera angles and the ability to pause and they STILL get the call wrong?
- goalie : I agree don't get dilusional over our three game winning streak. Changes MUST be made. I am however, glad to see the effort being put forth by the players.
- Mats Naslund : I just went to capgeek to see who the Avalanche might be dealing for a rental - and I see they have only 6 players signed for next season!!! There are a couple young D men on that squad who are RFAs who would do very nicely next season.
- Mats Naslund : One thing I know - the 3 game winning streak had better not get PG thinking about holding onto guys for a PO run. Trade them, build the value and move on to next year.
- Mats Naslund : How about Max Pac though.. 21 goals and on pace for 65 points this year. That is absolutely monster for a guy at his age/experience and especially coming after a horrific injury. Huge cornerstone moving forward. On pace for 33 goals.. could he get 35?
- Mats Naslund : Didn't get to see it either - and while I don't really care about the win, I am very glad that Gomez scored so we don't have to endure all of the negativity in the media about him for the rest of the year. He still su@ks, but at least it won't be a topic every shift he takes.
- goalie : Didn't get to see the game at all but it's great to see Pacs get a hat trick and fpor Cole to be + 3. When was the last time this team won three games in a row? Great victory -looks like they're giving 100% effort!
- Senet1 : 4-2 win habs
- Senet1 : Gomez scores, Yea!!!
- goalie : As I said yesterday it will be interesting to see what our lame ass GM gets for players he ships out. Bourque is good and he'll help us but I still think we could have gotten more for him and for Halak when he was traded.
- Avatar37 : round those picks occur (probably 3rd).
- Avatar37 : An interesting article. If we slip to the 5th or 7th draft pick, a very interesting case could be made for drafting Galchenyuk. If we wind up with the second or third pick, I'm not sure who I'd draft, because clearly Yakupov is going to be drafted first overall. Our second round pick also becomes interesting, I know I'd take Vasilevski if he were still available. It will also be interesting to see if we can turn some of our veteran players (Moen, Gill, Campoli) into draft picks, and what
- Avatar37 : «link»
- Avatar37 : That is why PG should have waited on trading Cammalleri. Right now, there is a high demand for a top 6 forward, we could have gotten much more than Bourque in return. That isn't a knock against Bourque, but a knock against a knee-jerk reaction trade that didn't maximize our return on a top asset.
- Avatar37 : «link»
- Avatar37 : chips fall where they may. After all, the only difference between finishing 17th and 29th is how good a pick you get in the draft.
- Avatar37 : We currently sit in 26th place in the league. We are 15 points ahead of Columbus, it's safe to bet at this point they will place last. We are, however, only 4 points ahead of Edmonton so it's still wide open as to who is going to finish second last. I still think that it's time to sit the veterans, play the youth, let them get experience, and regroup for next year. I'm not suggesting deliberately tanking like the Penguins, but give all our young players lots of playing time and let the c
- Avatar37 : goalie - If it were not for the play of Cammalleri, we would never have made it out of round 1. Cammalleri played as big a part, if not bigger, than Halak did. Sure, Halak played well, but remember the team collapsed in front of him, making his job much easier. We had lots of blocked shots and the ones that got through were typically from the outside.
- Senet1 : Goalie you are absolutely right, of course the one thing we had the two previous years that won the games that we are losing this year was our power play. If you look at say 10 games that we should have won had we had a similar power play, again we would not be having these conversations. When your PP goes from first to last in the league that is a lot of goals.How many games have we lost this year by one goal. Again poor management who did not prepare for Markov's possible absence.
- goalie : I'll put it another way.... we need more players who are willing to get their noses dirty.
- goalie : Two years ago when our goaltending stole series adn our players suddenly scored the coaches / GM believed that that was our true team . Well time has proven that was not. Though I was very glad to see the Habs knock off some very good teams we were very fortunate. And fortunate that spring was spelled HALAK!
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


May 28, 2007 at 7:08 pm
Joshtm is a hack.
May 28, 2007 at 7:11 pm
OUr winning percentage was horrific without this stud on defence so signing him was a must. 5.75 is alot however he would have gotten 7 on the open market. WE would have had to spend at least 6 to get timonen so keeping Markov is the best move. Good job Gainey. Just dont sign Briere to 7 million please.
May 28, 2007 at 7:17 pm
Yeah, we had this sign this guy. I think 5.75 million is a lot of money, but how much would this guy have cost elsewhere ?
With the same money, could we have get better guys ? Don’t think so, it would have cost more money to get something like him, or two other guy less good. So we needed him. If we lost him, we would have go no more defense at all, I can only think of Komisarek, who is getting better and better and markov is helping him in that way.
But I still believe we could have signed him for a bit less, like 5.25. But that’s Gainey budget, not sure it’s good but what can I say. I still think he gave too much money to Koivu and Kovalev (I am not talking about samsonov here).
Go Habs Go !
May 28, 2007 at 7:56 pm
You have to admit, Markov has what it takes, but what everyone forgets is Hockey is a team sport. Unless you have constant level of defense, having a great defenseman on one line for only part of the game means what, some 40 or 45 minutes of watching Dandenault and Bouillon basically destroy the defense, and basically ruin the confidence of up and coming rookies? It’s like having one really nice tire on the car and using cheapies for the rest….guess what, its gonna ruin your ride and your engine….and it looks weird.
May 29, 2007 at 2:32 am
Yeah and playing Markov with just inexperienced and immature players is like putting a Nascar engine in a chevette. ITs just a waste.
May 29, 2007 at 4:46 am
I still prefer to have Markov and inexperienced or immature instead of only inexperienced and immature players…..
May 29, 2007 at 5:37 am
Too much money. But it’s pretty much the going rate, and with all the negative press about racism towards Russian players in Montreal this past season, I guess they had to throw their wallet at the only Russian who apparently still wants to play for the habs. This doesn’t bode well for a Souray signing, which saddens me, as I kind of enjoyed having an effective power play the last few seasons.
May 29, 2007 at 11:06 am
Wow!! big bucks, can’t wait to see what K-man and Higgy will end up with
May 29, 2007 at 2:21 pm
Hey guys….love the banter between you freaking loons…Just to see can be the 1st to log in and write “Joshtm is a hack”…nice work Higgy 21…Actually, I think Josh is quite funny and insightful, but question….Did Messers Boullion and Dandy diss you at a card signing event…or not push your wheelchair around at the annual Christmas skating party ??…Come onnnnnnn…those 2 are not that bad…what’s the dealio ?
The Duker…pukin’ on your radio in Toronto
May 29, 2007 at 3:23 pm
LOL hey Josh why not answer your own posts somemore !!!
God your some funny dude …. you have nothing new to say yet? Just more of the same huh ?
We know we know Bob is bad , Carbo is bad, Koivo, is bad, Johnson and all the others are bad, there is nothing good, everyone is bad, the habs are doomed, ect ect ect !!!
Yes Josh we know we know …
Good to see Markov bad hope to see some more news real soon …
May 29, 2007 at 3:25 pm
That was spose to read Good to see Markov back …we need to be able to edit our posts here how hard would that be to setup… geeze we are in 2007 you know?
May 29, 2007 at 5:15 pm
I think dandenault and boullion tag teamed joshtm’s old lady thats why he has such a hate on for them lol.
May 29, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Great sigining, I can honestly say that i dont care what happens tom ontreals defense corps as long as that when the dust settles, komisarek and markov are still around. I dont care about the other defensmen.
May 29, 2007 at 7:38 pm
Detroit can have Dandeneault for nothing if they take Sammy off our hands. Let CUbe stay for another year. AN injury free offseason will really help his game.
May 29, 2007 at 7:57 pm
At 5.75 per year, this is the going rate for a guy like Markov so it’s fair to the market value.
But you can kiss Souray goodbye. His shot and leadership will be missed. His defensive play, passing and skating won’t.
May 29, 2007 at 8:16 pm
Geeze, aren’t we missing our Lithium pills today? Is the sun a bit hot today on you? Cause hey you are just radiating there, drink a bit of salt to go with your brown nosing of those losers. If you can’t see Dandenault for being what he is, a really lousy defenseman, and the other just as lousy defenseman and all those losses we had to endure all year long, like, gee, Habs fans, eyes open but brain ain’t working….no wonder Gainey can rip you off, and give you the con job of “great chemistry” for Sakku’s slump, Johnson’s slips, and Kovalev’s elbow and don’t forget Jack Todd’s fav. Rivet’s Flu….and we can’t forget the food poisoning excuse.
No wonder Gainey used the same words as the “w” he is just as dense and stupid.
It is sad that Gainey would sign Markov for so much for so long, leaving very little room to manouver, yet continuing to waste money on the likes of Dandenault and Bouillon, and praising **** like Johnson, Ninnima and Samsonov.
Honestly, how much more obvious “go phoque yourselves Habs fans” by both Gainey and Kovalev do you have to hear from Bob and Alexei to figure it out? Crazy Bob doesn’t care.
And what’s this bull about inexperienced and immature players. Listen buddy, it was the rookies that pulled us out of the slump. Because guess what, your great heroes Sakku and Alexei were busy being guess what “immature and inexperienced” leaders. Most of the Habs dynasty was won with guess what “immature and inexperienced” rookies, ala Dryden, and the list goes on and on.
It is sad when Crazy Bob doesn’t take advantage of his “immature and inexperienced” players like oh gee, the Ducks and the Senators, who have managed to play in the playoffs so many years in a row.
What a pile of **** about “building” the team, as opposed to Sakku worrying that he would get the boot that he so justly deserves for basically destroying the season with his prima donna hooks and turning a power play into a power play against the habs. How many “great” hockey players have that stupid and unique skill of destroying a promising offense with young rookies and turn it into a horrible loss at the hands of lousy defensemen like Ninnima, Dandenault, and Bouillon?
Where the hell was Johnson all this time that he was supposedly shutting down Crosby and Alfredsson? No where, he is the great white ghost on the team, the spirit falling on the ice after he gets so boozed up he can’t even check instead he falls on the other team….how many times did we see that?
What kind of GM would keep a coach who changes lines more often than his socks? Man that was so Un-NHL-like, what is so professional about that? What kind of “great God-like” wisdom is that for a GM to watch his coach basically destroy a winning momentum with getting rid of rookies who were responsible for all the victories and benching good players just so Dandenault and Bouillon and even friggen Samsonov and Johnson could get more ice time so they “could get better”….well it sure didn’t work that way, I still can’t believe Gainey would say something like that. Ya right, they were so good they cost us a foot into the door of the playoffs. So answer this, if Gainey is so good, why did he allow all the **** that went on, the prima donna complaints by Rivet, Kovalev and even Koivu?
HUH????
May 30, 2007 at 2:50 am
Its sad that you wasted so much of a may evening to wrtie all that funk.
May 30, 2007 at 2:17 pm
Well, after i heard the news about the Markov signing i had to let it digest a little. Obviously this means that Souray will sign elsewhere…my guess is in Anaheim because they feel they need to hoard all the best defenseman in the league.
I personally love Souray here in Montreal, however if Markov is worth almost six million a season, Souray will be commanding close to 7 mill after his “career” year. I would rather see him leave than to give him that kind of money, only to end up with another Bryan Mccabe scenario because we all know Souray will not be scoring 26 goals next year, probabaly not even 15. Good luck to Souray with his future team, but lets concentrate on fixing the in-house problems with our money in aquiring another top centre-man, and a scoring winger. I am sick and tired of seeing Kovalev’s talent go to waste because he either does not want to play here, or is injured or againg or just really is passive about winning. I like the prospect of briere coming to town…we need a player that we can brag about, a scorer…someone who will actually be up there with the leaders in scoring. When was the last time we had a player net over 80 points anyway?
We have great youth on the team and i see great promise in Higgins, Ryder, Komisarek,Plekanec and Latendresse. Koivu is entering the twilight of his career and is really passionate about winning here in Montreal. Only a couple missing pieces and we will have a stanley cup winner in no time. I predict with confidence a cup banner raised in this city within 5 years.
Any comments to that?
May 30, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Well said Chris, I agree. But on only a couple of missing pieces I have to disagree, a bit, more like we have way too many wrong pieces to begin with to really have a cup contender.
May 30, 2007 at 8:35 pm
I don’t understand why Carbo and Gainey don’t remember that size and talent are a key ingredent to building a winner,they should emulate Burke and the Ducks!
May 30, 2007 at 11:39 pm
I Agree with Josh. ME and you are like kindred spirits. We are confused and have many problems. BUt when it comes to hockey we know best. THe media is Montreal is correct about everything they right and really should be the people running the team. TIcket prices should be free and only players under the age of 22 should be allowed to play for the habs. Okay maybe 23. WE should trade away all leaders and big name players so that when youngsters like Higgins and Komi become free agents they will have no reason to stay and take off. Also the team should move from Montreal to HULL.
May 30, 2007 at 11:49 pm
Lapierre should be captain and play on the PP with Latendresse and Begin. Also we should bring up Groulx, CHipchura and Milroy to be the second PP unit. ALso me and Josh will be taking over the off ice services. NO more jerseys or flags allowed in the arena. ALso no cheering of encouragement for the team after the opening face off. THis is a business and we should not be able to enjoy the team unless it is run like a regular 9-5 job. ALso no families allowed anymore and we will decide where eveyrone sits and encourage opposing teams fans to attend the games. NO more beer or food sold at the games. Just water and sour grapes. We must remember we are not fans to enjoy the game or to have hope. We must only be critics. HOckey is a business and must not be taken to heart. IF we win we say nothing, if we lose we will be heard. THIS IS THE WAY OF ME AND JOSH>
May 30, 2007 at 11:57 pm
WE must remember it is not about trying to win a cup. IT is about bringing youth to teh team. IT is about giving up on players before they have a second chance. IF a player is hurt like BOullion and misses the whole offseason workout and is behind the eight ball and has a bad year, he is out. NO questions asked. Players dont rebound. Like cmon Sure Selanne is a great player agian and was **** three years ago but how often does that happen. ONly about 40 percent of the time. INjuries dont cut it. If a player is almost blinded and has a career year but takes a few hoopking players then we get rid of him. ITs not about building a cup contender, its about getting rid of players as soon as they upset us a little. SUre Latendresse may be extremely slow, overly confident and overated but we like him because he is young and has a chance to become better one day. NOT FASTER OF COURSE. We want order not a cup. But wait what will happen when we get everything we want. Well thats the fun part, we will find new reasons and new names to target. HAHAHAHAHA
May 31, 2007 at 8:07 pm
Okay, We all know that Souray asks for a bit much, but personally the guys deserves it. If we lose Markov, we need Souray, I love Souray. It is very difficulty to score 28 goals in a season as a DEFENCEMAN! I mean not even the offensive players score that many goals and for sure there will be changes because the Habs didn’t make the playoffs this year, but there is no reason to sign Souray somewhere else. If anything Begin should leave, he’s done absolutely nothing this season and Carboneau should talk some sense into Kovalev, all of a sudden he stopped being amazing like he used to be. I’m pretty shocked at what kind of money Markov is making, Souray will defenatly ask for at least 7 million if Markov is getting 6. Don’t trade Souray! That’s for sure. With an 100 mph slap shot, Gainey better leave him where he is!
Go HABS GO!
June 14, 2007 at 9:48 am
#24 Sourayfan44
Have you just awaken from a comma? We signed Markov to a to a 4 year deal…so we’re not losing him unless we want to. May you have split personalities? Because you go on to state this fact later in your post about how Markov terms of his contract. Then you go on ripping Begin? Begin’s return from his injury (broken foot) although premature definatly not at 100% and playing as a 4th liner, gave the team a boost by adding heart to our team that was struggling to show up during one of the most horrific losing steaks in recent history. Souray would be a great player to keep but the same goes for players such as Smyth, Breire, Drury, ect. at what point does the cost out weigh the benefit?