Crosby Show
-
Tonight should be a good one. The league’s poster boy and leading scorer in town to take on the Habs.
Crosby is on fire and all eyes will be on him to continue his point explosion tonight. 10 points in the last 2 games put him ahead of Jaromir Jagr as the league’s leading scorer.
The PBJ line should see a lot of ice and have their hands full containing Crosby and
Evgeni Malkin who makes his first ever visit to Montreal.There’s no denying the Pens are improving and have a lethal offense but there are still several defensive concerns that exist.
Chris Higgins is finally back tonight and it’ll be interesting to see if he can step back in and find his game quickly.
If stats mean anything to you, Cristobal Huet didn’t face the Penguins last season, but is 2-0-0 with an 0.58 goals-against average and one shutout in his career against them. Both wins came in the 2003 calendar year, when he was with Los Angeles.
Should be a good one.
- goalie : I don't know when they'll announce it but the Oilers will be signing Sutter (Flames ex-coach) to coach their team - that's why Kevin Lowe chose him to coach in the World's. That was the world's worst kept secret.
- Senet1 : I guess I wish we could get it done so all the speculating was over and we can get to building out team.
- goalie : I can't type.... what a faux pas on my behalf...
- goalie : I just realized what I said adn didn't say yesterday. What a fayx as on my behalf. Regarding coaching Randy Cunnyworth MUSDT stay as an assistant- he deserves at least that after the tremendous job he did in the latter part of this past season. I'd still mlike to have Robinson, Carbo adn Allard on the staff also.
- Avatar37 : I agree Senet, my choice if we can't have Cunneyworth would be Crawford, Robinson on defense, Cunneyworth for offense, and Carbo as offense/faceoffs .
- Senet1 : I think if I had my choice it would be Crawford and see if he could get Carbo and Robinson as assistants. That would be my idea coaching team.
- goalie : I witnesed Marc Crawford MANY times when the Avs, etc. played against Oilers and let me tell you - he is constantly on the referees asses virtually game after game. He is the complete OPPOSITE of J. Martin. Crawford is calm on TSN but he is one excited coach behind the bench. A friend of mine who was an NHL linesman for 26 years said they dreaded Crawford he was so tough on the officials!
- goalie : You know, I've bee thinking about the coaching situation. I'd be really excited if the Habs had Hartley as head coach and Carbo adn Robinson as his assistants. I also read it somewhere about a month ago that Toronto's goalie coach Allard (?) wants to relocate back to Montreal where he has his goaltending school/business. Add him to the mix and I'd say the Habs would be in great shape coaching wise.
- Avatar37 : Well, from what I recall, Hartley didn't do all that well with the Thrashers. But, I don't know enough about him to judge one way or the other. Crawford I do know, and he always seemed to be a good, level headed coach to me.
- Senet1 : even Pacioretty two years ago did not impress any of us. Younger players have to play and make mistakes and learn from those mistakes. If they sit in the press box they are learning nothing.
- Senet1 : Of course if he have some good assistants like a Larry Robinson to teach the young defence and someone like Carbo to teach faceoffs etc. then your coach does not have to be as good at teaching. If Hartley fits the bill you get no argument from me. My only previous point is that if he is impatient with your younger players to the point that he does not play them, then we are right back where we were with Martin. Martin was a good coach too, but how he handled Emelin, PK and even Pacioretty two
- goalie : I would like to see the Habs sign a coach who realizes that our team isn't tough enough (we need to get bigger and somewhat more nastier),the coach needs t be a great TEACHER and be a coach who can get the players to understand and buy into his system. Other than that I couldn't care what lingo he speaks. I wnat to see our team become a ligitimate contender fast!
- HabsLoseAgain : Well we dont know if he is or is not a teaching coach. I woukd just hate to paint Hartley something that he is not. There will always be questions but if Hartley was hired as the habs new bench boss i for one would not be overly upset.
- Senet1 : My thoughts are not that he is or is not a good coach but rather that when he won the cup he had an experience team of superstars on that team. Where as we have a group of young inexperienced players, is he a teaching coach or a tactical coach or both? I am not question whether he is a good coach, but my question therefore is he the coach for us at this point in the deveopment of our team?? Not sure we are all purely speculating at the moment?
- Senet1 : Something happened to my first post. I will try again.
- Senet1 : That is why I said I am not sure he is the coach for us at this time? Right now we are all speculating including yourself, because non of us know for sure?
- HabsLoseAgain : Crawford also won a cup with Patrick Roy so would you say he is a good coach or did he just have great players and one of the best goaltenders of alltime?
- HabsLoseAgain : Senrt so please give me some reasons why you think Hartley is not the coach the habs need right now. What is it that you do not like about him or his coaching style?
- HabsLoseAgain : Well all great coaches had great players playing for them so i guess you you add a a pile of other coaches to that list including Bowan......
- Senet1 : Hartley, was he a good coach or did he just have great players and one of the best altime goaltenders of all time. I am not sure that he is the type of coach that this organization needs right now. Unless of course we sign a ton of free agents.
- Avatar37 : However, my feelings may completely be wrong, Hartley may turn out to be a good fit.
- Avatar37 : I didn't say Hartley was unknown, I said we demoted a good coach in Cunneyworth and now have an unknown quantity because we don't have a coach. I don't have that great a feeling about Hartley, I'd be much more comfortable with Crawford.
- HabsLoseAgain : In my opinion i think he might be a good fit in montreal. Oh and he also likes to have a tough team.
- HabsLoseAgain : Also this year he coached the ZSC Lions to the swiss championship title.
- HabsLoseAgain : lol the so called "unknown" won a cup in 2000-2001 with the colarado avalanch.
- HabsLoseAgain : lol Bob Hartley is not an unknown lol.....sheesh.
- Senet1 : I think he has until the trading deadline to show us that he deserves to be on this team. If he does not get back on track then he could be simply a 2nd round draft pick to whoever we can trade him to.
- Avatar37 : Bourque reminds me of Pouliot, size, skill, and invisible. He needs to get back to playing a physical game and bang people around and maybe he'll start getting some of those garbage goals again. Need to get to the front of the net. I hope he can find his game again.
- Avatar37 : We had a good coach in Randy Cunneyworth. Now we have an unknown, with Bob Hartley rumoured to be the front runner. I'd rather have Cunneyworth.
- goalie : A player like Rene Bourwue has al the physical attributes of what would be a beter than average player. Hwever, he certainly didn't play that well especially after being in Montreal about three weeks. We NEED players like Rene to play hard AND produce points on a REGULAR BASIS in order for us to be competitive.
- Senet1 : MONTREAL – Rene Bourque had a rocky start to his career as a Hab, but he’s planning on using the next four years to make up for it. After arriving in Montreal under less-than-ideal circumstances in January, Bourque spent the following 38 games hoping to find the spark he needed to rekindle his offensive production. Despite flanking Tomas Plekanec on the team’s second line to close out the season, the 30-year-old sniper suddenly found himself firing blanks in his new NHL home.
- Senet1 : I think we have to be patient and not expect too much too soon. Let's get a strong management team in place, make a good choices in the draft get a good coach and then see what we need at the free agent market. I will not be too disapointed if we miss the playoffs again next year if it means a long term team success. We have the opportunity to make some major strides over the next two years at the draft table. Then we fill in the holes.
- goalie : I certainly agree that we need to get some impact forwards who will sign for 5 years, not for a season then walk away. That's not going to help us.
- goalie : I wouldn't trade PK for Ovetchkin no matter what. He is a coach's NIGHTMARE and a poor team player.
- Senet1 : I believe he will as we graducally put better players around him and build this team.
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005


December 16, 2006 at 6:54 pm
yeah but was Crosby with the pens in 2003? don’t think so lol so those stats will probably not be worth anything…
December 16, 2006 at 7:48 pm
I can’t believe that the game is actually on CBC in ENGLISH!! It’s about time the CBC showed the Hab’s for once, other then when they play the Laffs. but I do feel sorry for those poor people in Newfoundland and Labrador cause they are stuck watching the lousy Laffs lol!! Hope Higgie has a great game!! GO HABS GO!!!
December 16, 2006 at 8:40 pm
ok guys… how many penalties did we get so far? 8-9?!? Those refs really gotta calm down…
December 16, 2006 at 8:40 pm
the PENALTIES!!PENALTIES!!PENALTIES!!! we’re killing ourselves!!! NO DISCIPLINE!!!
December 16, 2006 at 8:56 pm
How to lose a hockey game? just ask the Montreal Canadiens! They’re wonderful at taking penalties. the habs report: penalties…..A+
lack of discipline…..A+
defence………F
all in all, this team is unable to stay out of the penalty box!
It will be their downfall in the playoffs, and that is why they will only be, and always be, just a PRETENDER! Never a serious CONTENDER!
December 16, 2006 at 9:01 pm
I told you guys on an earlier blog. We NEVER WIN ON SATURDAY’S!! check our record this season on Saturday night games. it is HORRIFIC!!
December 16, 2006 at 9:51 pm
Crosby Who ????????????
December 16, 2006 at 9:51 pm
what a turnaround! 22 shots for us. but guys, please no more 1st periods like that.You’re going to give us a heart attack. if we could have more periods like the 2nd one, nobody would beat us. keep it up guys. our PP is lethal.Souray is the man, with his bullet shot.
December 16, 2006 at 9:57 pm
Cue the comeback…Habs 5 Pens 2, 22 shots in second period for Habs. Saku is having a fantastic game and that third line is doing a great job shutting down Crosby and Malkin. Hopefully this one is in the BANK!!GO HABS GO!!!
December 16, 2006 at 10:46 pm
Well well, looks like nothing can stop us from winning, penalties don’t seem to do it, neither does playing against malkin and crosby
Next Challenge, Sabres!
December 16, 2006 at 11:01 pm
Higgins had a strong game once he was moved back up with Koivu + Ryder.
2nd line is also starting to click, but Plekanec has to get his shots on target. He had 10 shots, 2 on net, 8 wide.
3rd line shut down Crosby + Malkin well, and provided some good forechecking.
PK is going as well as PP.
Habs are lookin’ good!
Sabres are next, GO HABS GO!!!!!!!!!!
December 16, 2006 at 11:11 pm
I think the Rangers didn’t show up tonight. that’s the only way the leafs could win 9-2. Enjoy all those goals tonight, leafs, because you won’t be seeing them again! I can’t wait until we meet them again, so we can bomb them!
It’s nice to see koivu scoring. his production is way up this year. kudos to him, and Lapierre-his 2nd NHL goal. Now, if only that 2nd line could get going.maybe put higgins at center on 2nd line, and move Latendresse to 2nd line,and move Kovalev to the 1st line.If only we could stay out of the penalty box, we could play 60 minutes of hockey. Tuesday, in Buffalo will be a tough game, because Ottawa beat the sabres tonight, in Buffalo. Play smart, habs in Buffalo. good luck! If we could beat them, their lead would only be 5 points.
December 16, 2006 at 11:12 pm
Breaking News! Jarkko Ruttu is the league’s biggest coward. That was an absolutly pahtetic display. As Don Cherry said, he’s the biggest phoney of all time.
And talk about a smothering defence! No team has been able to contain Crosby this season like Montreal did tonight. And does anyone have better special teams? 4 PP goals and a killer PK.
It’s looking more and more like 1rst overall is an obtainable goal. Right now they’re the second best team in the east.
Finally, i’ve noticed that clutch has a new spelling in the dictionary, it can now be spelled K-O-I-V-U!
December 16, 2006 at 11:19 pm
I was reading some of the comments on that petition web site and I cannot believe that the CBC in Montreal is showing the Leafs INSTEAD of the Habs on most weekends. That is absolutely assinine on the CBC’s part. They really make me sick with their poor announcers and unprofessionalism. I’m done with them!!
December 16, 2006 at 11:22 pm
Oh…Excellent game by the way. GO HABS GO!!!
December 17, 2006 at 12:35 am
First I am still shocked that they showed the Habs game out west. What a pleasant surprise.
Great win! Lets forget the first period.
The 2nd line is really starting to look strong. They were are best linie tonight, I dont think anyone can argue that. As much as I like Gui you can tell teh first line is alot more potent with HIggy on it. HIggy is too dynamic to be playing on the 4th.
I think they summed it up perfectly at teh end that the Habs just has too much depth for the Pens. I have not seen this much depth since the late 80′s. NOt that I remeber the late 80′s.
December 17, 2006 at 6:31 am
Hey Snake,
I agree with you about pretty much everything except one: The second line being our best one that night?!?
The only person to get point was Kovalev, and he got them in power play so he wasn’t even out there with the rest of the second line. Sure, I find that line played well, but the first was wayyy better.
Now I think we can say that unless some dramatic thing happens to the team ( Koivu getting and eye injury again) we are cup contenders. The only obstacle that we need to overcome now is buffalo. If we can win this one in regulation and not by some lucky shot with a sec left in overtime by a guy like souray
then we are in league with them. Last time we beat them was in buffalo so seems like it isn’t whats gonna stop us from wining.
Can’t wait for Tuesday!
December 17, 2006 at 8:49 am
If we beat Buffalo we will be at 5 points of the first place in the East? Amazing…. and a lot of people said that our canadiens were not going to make the playoffs lol.
December 17, 2006 at 10:48 am
I really wish that some of the “bloggers” in here, (AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE, (AND I KNOW YOUR ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION)) but would you be kind enough to spare us the end of period rants about how “the habs are gonna lose again…” and,” they always lose on saturday’s…” and, “they have no discipline…and,” FIRE THE TEAM!!!” Your not only embarassing yourself, but it’s the kind of “band wagon jumping” that a lot of “so called” montreal fans are known for!But usually their guilty of jumping off and on from game to game! Not period to period, or even shift to shift! Jesus have some faith in YOUR team! That’s part of what being a REAL FAN IS ABOUT..Support your team through good AND BAD not just win or tie!
It’s just more than a little irritating!!!
Bring on the SABRES!
GO HABS GO!
December 17, 2006 at 1:12 pm
Way to go Jay, Unless your dressed in a suit and stand behind the bench,shut up with what needs to be done with the team in regards to trades and who needs to go,Last time I checked the team was doing pretty good with the mix thats on it now.
December 17, 2006 at 1:24 pm
I thought this was a blog? that means, ANYONE CAN SAY ANYTHING THEY PLEASE ! get it? So if you don’t like a variety of opinions, TOUGH! This blog would be awfully BORING, IF EVERYONE AGREED! And I can back up all my remarks with STATS!
December 17, 2006 at 1:30 pm
Also, I don’t think there is 1 person. who would agree that the habs played well in the 1ST PERIOD,especially being outshot 17-3! also, nobody would argue with the fact that the habs took way too many PENALTIES in the 1st period! so lighten up, and realize that I spoke about the 1st period only! besides, there is nothing wrong with wanting 60 minutes out of your team! we all want to see them do well, and NOTHING is more frustrating than seeing your team spend the WHOLE PERIOD IN THE PENALTY BOX! that’s all i said, and it was factual!And if I want to make remarks every minute of the game,THAT’S MY PEROGATIVE!
December 17, 2006 at 2:04 pm
So what are the chances of us beating Buffalo,again? they lost to Ottawa, Saturday, so it makes our job tougher, but if we skate, and come up big defensively, i think we can do it. How about moving Latendresse to the 2nd line, with Kovalev at center, and Samsonov on the other wing? Maybe Latendresse can get the line moving, and out of this funk,or what about Lapierre with Kovalev and Latendresse? they could dig the puck out of the corners, and feed it to Kovy in the slot.
December 17, 2006 at 2:23 pm
Well said Jay. I couldnt believe the posts I was reading during the game either.
That being said Fanatic is right about his right to say whatever, whenever as this is a blog for opinions. If he had been in my livingroom however watching the game with me and whining like that I would have asked him to leave. I think my exact comments to the people who were watching with me after the first were ” watch the habs turn it up in the second frame “.
Fanatic is obviously very passionate about our habs, but unfortunately I think he may be one of those who makes funeral arrangements when someone sneezes.
sorry about all that verbal seepage guys….reminded myself of Bob McKenzie there ( ewww ).
Fanatic…you say what you want, when you want to….if we dont like it, we’ll just skip over it, OR because this is a blog we may jump on you from time time.Gawd knows I have been in the past, but that’s just part of the fun here no?….bottom line is, if we were all in a pub together tilting a coolie, we’d all be on the same page.
go habs.. 4-2 for us on tuesday…a goal each for Higgy & Kovy.
December 17, 2006 at 2:26 pm
PS….Has anyone else read any of this **** about the habs seeking Sergei Fedorov?…what a crock….6 mil per year….jesus….Gainey is smarter than that.
December 17, 2006 at 3:40 pm
though I still think we should have taken Perreault. he scored at least 8 goals already for the coyotes,but now it’s too late. I do believe that we should try and get a backup to huet; a goalie that can compliment him,and not just play 10 games a year. If we can get accomplish that(via trade, or from Hamilton), we would really be in the driver’s seat. why do we have so much trouble beating Buffalo and New jersey? it’s been going on for decades now! I can remember in the 70′s not being able to beat Buffalo! what a mystique!
December 17, 2006 at 5:37 pm
I think that Perreault was too slow for the canadiens. Since Gainey is here he try to make a very fast team.
December 17, 2006 at 5:46 pm
You know…we just missed a chance with Bondra…I think we might have been able to get him with performance bonuses. He’s gonna be another Shanahan. And someone mentioned that Forsberg might be available…
mmm…after seeing and hearing of his oft injury prone body…passing him by may be the wiser move. I still think that Bondra might have filled in the closure role (one that Ryder seems to have lost and Higgins due to injury hasn’t fulfilled) also, Kovalev just might be finding the trigger and which Samsonov hasn’t been able to grip (only after 19 or so games). I think having Bondra would have enabled a trade scenario more palatable and more appealing.
However, just thinking out loud of course watching the group continue on their winning ways means that the trigger for a trade doesn’t have to be pushed until the right formula comes along. So, we stand put so long as the wins are achieved. I still think they have shown signs of weakness and stronger teams will exploit this when we are invited to the dance. Just the same let’s see if they can make the Sabres sweat it out a little more. Go Habs Go!
December 17, 2006 at 5:51 pm
Bondra is 39 years old and only played half a season last year because of injury. Enough said.
December 17, 2006 at 5:55 pm
First of all, if you look up a few posts I did aknowledge everyone’s right to their own opinion in this room!
I pourposely never pointed the finger at anyone specifically, and All I was saying was MY OPINION of what a true fan should be and how a true fan should try to support their team as opposed to acting like the overbearing stereotypical hockey parent!
@ Fanatic…If you identifyed with my comments above, well then maybe you should spend a moment or two considering exactly why you immediately felt you were the fodder for my comments!
Could you be a touch on the “Rubbernecking Bandwagon” I Don’t know! What do you think? Do you feel that my opinion was wrong that we should all just give up after 20 bad minutes of a 60 minute hockey game?! Imagine if ALL the “fans” after the 1st period came back and booed relentlessy or even worse just left the game!!! Kind of interesting visual don’t you think!
December 17, 2006 at 6:29 pm
sorry, but my comment on Bondra still holds…someone who has 39 years of age and plays like he’s 30 and contributes (hence my performance scale) then it should be considered. If he’s prone to injury…well, that’s a whole other topic…see my comments on Forsberg. (just the same would be nice to cash in on someone overachieving eventhough he have been dismissed by everyone). Go Habs Go!
December 17, 2006 at 8:38 pm
obviously, Chicago thought good enough about Bondra, to sign him.He did score over 20 goals last year with Atlanta, so he still can score. we don’t want Forsburg. he is injury prone, and his contract is 6MIL/year. forget it! I’m sure, as teams will drop out of the playoff race, they will make players expendable. We need only to bide our time. I can almost guarantee that Gainey or Gauthier will go get a centerman,and might be willing to part with Samsonov ,KOvalev, or Ryder, should thr right scenario arise.As far as Souray is concerned, unless we get a Dman with a great blueline shot,I bet we keep Souray for the entire season.If we give him up for next to nothing, our PP will suffer, and be ordinary without him. Do we want to take that chance, and possibly lose in the playoffs, because of a lack of PP strength? NO!The last point man, with a great shot on the PP, was Al MacInnis. Souray’s shot is that good.The only Dman I would consider getting in his place, is Jovanovsky,and I bet Phoenix might be willing to part with him, considering they will probably drop out of the playoff race very soon. We can dream, can’t we?
December 18, 2006 at 12:56 am
There is nothing worse then a hockey fan who contantly criticizes and belittles his favourite team. These are the same people who give up after down a goal at teh first intermission and are constanlt calling for a trade when their team is 2nd in the conference in points. I feel bad for these people because they spend all their time bi*ching and complaining they are missing out on enjoying one heck of a hockey team. Go cheer for some other team or join the Montreal media.
December 18, 2006 at 1:18 am
there is nothing worse than a person who belittles other human beings, who have the courage and the dignity to stand up for what they believe in.
If people on this blog get upset when others decide to make a comment, they should not be on this blog. this is a BLOG-it’s sole purpose is to have a variety of opinions. it does not have to reflect the same opinion or view of each person. berating and trying to chastize others who make intelligent comments, is not self serving to this blog.it only shows what a little narcissistic mind they have and it will only exacerbate their fragile and worthless brains. so put that in your pipe, and smoke it, because you sound like your on something anyways!
December 18, 2006 at 2:21 am
Umm.. guys? why are we fighting over stupid little things? You know how the habs are winning right now? because of their chemistry. But then when I look at all of us in this blog, I don’t see that chemistry.
I guess that both can’t have it. We had it last year so the habs lost and now the fans bicker each other so that the habs can win. Fair enough.
Oh and I hope u understood what I meant… STOP FIGHTING EACH OTHER!!! Keep it for the Laffs and Buffalo on tuesday.
December 18, 2006 at 11:46 am
I guess some people would rather criticize other bloggers than criticize their own team. I call those people idiots, because they don’t realize that everyone is on the same page! we all want what’s good for the team. life is not perfect! unless the habs have won as many games as they have played, they’re not perfect! so if there is room for improvement, and there is, what’s wrong with voicing our opinion? that’s exactly what is forum is all about. these guys , so almighty, who come on this blog and criticize others, look at your own comments. So unless you want us to say derogatory comments about you, shut up, and listen to what we’re saying. you might learn a thing or 2!
December 18, 2006 at 12:32 pm
Couldn’t of said it better Hab Heaven… Oh yeah, add GO HABS GO!!!
December 18, 2006 at 2:52 pm
The habs gotta fix their defense, honestly, anyone and everyone routinely walks into the habs blue line, go right up to Huet and dumps their shot with impunity, almost like as if there is no defense. Or the other way, Souray routinely dumps the other forwards into Huet, what gives there, Sheldon the coach says knock em down, not into Huet for God’s Sake!!!
December 18, 2006 at 3:01 pm
But most of the people here are not just criticizing the team! they are spilting up the team,trading the other half of it,if you going to critize the team at least be constructive not destructive!!!!! thats being a idiot.
December 18, 2006 at 3:26 pm
obviously, we can’t trade half a team. c’mon! we just need a little tweaking to get this team to perform at it’s top level, game in and game out. usually every team needs 1 or 2 changes, be it offensively or defensively ,to make the team perform at it’s top level. remember, this is only December.are you satisfied with the personnel in this lineup until mid April? I don’t think there is 1 person who will HONESTLY admit that every piece of the puzzle is in place.personally, I do believe Huet will tire out come April if he’s forced to play almost every night. that’s only natural. The stamina required to do that, would be incredible, not to mention the mental strength necessary to do that. If i had to work 80 hours instead of 40, I’d be exhausted.it’s no different for goaltenders. think logically.having Aebischer, or whoever, play 1 game out of every 8, is not enough.Complimenting Huet,and playing every 3rd game ,would be much better.Unfortunately, Aebischer doesn’t have the strength, talent wise ,to do that, or Carbo would be playing him more often.at the beginning of the season, we didn’t know what we had.now we do, and Aebischer, in my opinion, isn’t a strong backup. So,look to Hamilton for a possible replacement.same goes for an offensive player,and Ninnimaa must go. he is a defensive liability, and not worth the money. so,we could save $2 mil+, and use that money to sign someone who would contribute every game, and not sit out almost every night,as Ninnimaa does. I am, and always have been a staunch Montreal Canadiens supporter, and that support will never wane. I just want this team to win,and get to the top. let’s try, as fans,to encourage this team to do whatever’s necessary, to get this team to the promised land- the Stanley cup! Let’s start with a win in Buffalo!
December 18, 2006 at 4:34 pm
Yeah cause thats what I see when I read most peoples rants is encouragement????
December 18, 2006 at 5:59 pm
Hab Heaven:
I wouldnt mind trading you right now.
December 18, 2006 at 6:10 pm
you couldn’t afford me. I’m worth more than you have! Also. I’m not belligerent or rude!
December 18, 2006 at 6:54 pm
I feel I would be worth at least 5 first round draft picks and the Bell Centre
December 18, 2006 at 7:04 pm
The Ottawa Sun reported on Sunday that rumours have been circulating around discussions between Montreal and Columbus on the fate of Sergei Federov. The article mentioned both Ninnimaa and Bonk in a possible deal for the $6 million center. If the reports are true it would certainly bring a talented player to center the Canadiens #2 line, albeit Federov is sometimes considered to be a player in decline. Any thoughts?
December 18, 2006 at 7:11 pm
There is no way this rumor is true. A lot of people, including myself, have complained about some of the European players not putting enough effort in and Federov is no different. He has 19 points this season. For someone earning 6 mil, that’s not enough, and I don’t think he’s even a FA after this season.
Federov is not the answer and would be a waste of ressources to get him. There’s no way they should trade Bonk. Did you see what he did to Crosby on Saturday?
And the 2 best GM’s in the league are Brian Burke and Bob Gainey. If Brian Burke didn’t want him then there’s no way that Doug McLean could pull the wool over Gainey’s eyes. And if there’s something we’ve learned about Gainey, it’s that if we’ve heard the rumor it’s generally not going to happen. Just cause he’s got a big name and cause he was good 7 years ago dosen’t mean it would be a good decision to bring him in.
December 18, 2006 at 7:46 pm
Fourth line has been posted for tomorrow:
Streit…Latendresse….Lapierre…
rds reports this to be a 4th line that is the envy of all coaches in the league.
all can penalty kill, play on the power play, and beat your number 1 line staight up 5 on 5.
not a bad problem to have huh?….should be a blast watching these guys go tomorrow, as they try to prove Carbo is right by putting them together….cant wait.
Izzy
December 18, 2006 at 8:08 pm
I agree that adding Fedorov to the lineup is waste of valubale resources. Given the Canadiens recent success, any profound changes could seriously disrupt team chemistry. Gainey is an intelligent GM and probably understands the implications of adding an unproven $6 million man. As the old cliche states: If it ain’t broke – don’t fix it!!
December 18, 2006 at 9:22 pm
Fedorov, maybe 5 years ago.
Bonk being traded, no way. They invested to much time in him.
Tampa will be moving one of the big 4, let’s get our hands on one of them.
If we are going to lose Souray next year, let’s see if we can get Boyle.
December 18, 2006 at 10:03 pm
Well, according to a media source in Montreal, Gainey was close to trading Ninima, Bonk and draft pick to Columbus for Sergei Fedorov. I think that the Habs should wait, and make a similar trade before trade deadline except for Pavel Datsyuk, who Detroit is having problems in contract negotiations. Try to keep Bonk as he is key in our sucessful PK.
I would love to see Datsyuk in a Habs uniform, he is amazing.
GO HABS GO