Game 74: Lightning/Habs
-
How will the Habs come out tonight? Which team will show?
A Panthers loss yesterday gives the Habs a little breathing room, and opportunity to create a bigger gap.
[rsslist:http://canadiens.nhl.com/rss/top-stories.xml]
Related
The fate of the Canadiens seems to be decided this morning after their failure to close last nights game in Buffalo.
Typical of band...
The Canadiens are in Philly tonight and with a win they can nail down 5 out of a possible 6 road points to start the season.
Guy Car...
What can you say about a guy like Michael Ryder? If you don't know how I feel about him refer to my past posts and getting him re-signe...
There are currently no tags for this post.
7 Comments
ShoutBox
Last Message 6 hours, 42 minutes ago
1 guest is online.
- Senet1 : seriously ready to challenge for the cup. He will us win games but he will not be the difference between winning the cup and not winning the cup. You pick up players like that once you have the team ready to challenge,.
- Senet1 : I am looking at the players to draft and there are a lot of big 6'3-6'5 forwards available ion the draft this year. If we could draft 3-4 big young players in the 2nd and 3rd round why would you want to give that up for a roster player who may have 2-3 years at best. If we are going to build a winner to have to build it with bigger players and there are a lot of good big players available this year. So you sign Ott and he is with us for the short run, but probably not when we are seriously re
- Senet1 : Boullion is a great mentor for the young D-men
- muller93 : Boullion is one of MBs great additions--Boull ion is a definite Keeper.
- muller93 : Getting rid of Kaberle frees up a lot of cash. Boullion is small but is reliable and doesn't back down from anyone.
- muller93 : Exactly Goalie any thoughts on a punishing D-man?
- goalie : They;re showing determination adn skill vs Ducks and Blackhawks.
- goalie : REd Wings could turn out to be the surprise team of this year's playoffs!
- goalie : WE need to rid our team of Kaberle and Webber. Step two would be to then move Diaz. If we get that big d-man I believe that would push Boullion to # 7 on the chart. We'd then go with Georges, PK,Markov (to continue mentoring Ememlin) Tinordi as our starting six . THEN I'd be excited about our chances. We could then work on getting bigger forwards.
- goalie : I too would gladly give up a 3rd round pick for Ott- the type of player we sadly lack. AND if we could get one more rugged, expeienced defenceman it would help immensely.
- muller93 : Senet what you are saying makes sense but if we can get Ott for a 3rd round I'll take that all day.
- muller93 : MB should be looking at a big D-man first, even though I like our blue line with the addition of Tinordi. We need that insurance just in case one gets injured. Also I'm a firm believer in starting with the goalie first then-defense-for wards-and we already have good goalie. We have all noticed when we have the lead Price is tough to beat.
- Senet1 : So sometimes you have to sacrifice for one year or two to build that team in the draft. then add the finishing touches through FA and trades.
- Senet1 : Muller, Detroit is another good example. They have been in the hunt every year with good well balanced teams yet only one or two cups to show for it. However, they have built a team that has a chance every years for the last 10+ years. That is what I think we have a chance to do this year with a good draft. It reminds me of the habs teams of the mid 80 and 90's we built a team then with sold draft picks and won the cup twice during that time period. So sometimes you have to sacrifice a one
- muller93 : Very true Senet, you do need luck and we haven't had any luck it seems since the habs moved to the Bell Center. We had an incredible run in 2010 with some crazy goal tending from Halak. With Galchenyuk-Tinor di-Gallagher all in 1 year--not too bad, even with an early exit in the playoffs.
- Senet1 : Muller I guess we all have our own ideas, but there has never been too many times that were successful when they traded their draft picks away. We have a chance to build this team so we have a shot at winning the cup over the next 10 years. Even as good as Pittsburgh has been they have only won the cup once since Crosby and Malkin have been with the team. That is because you not only need great players but you need luck to win, but one thing about Pittsburgh they have a chance every year. The
- muller93 : Good point on Torres, he might be a liability. Torres has to tone it down a bit, but that's his game-very aggressive.
- goalie : Though I don't condone what Raffi Torres did - thos shows you how repeat offenders or near offenders are going to be treated. His hit was NOT illegal BUT what the rap sheet adn reputation Torres has he got severly punished. Lesson to be learned by OTHER players because Torres dopesn't learn fromk his mistakes.
- muller93 : Senet normally I would agree with you on not trading draft picks but we are not in a rebuilding stage. Sometimes draft picks can be a roll of the dice and it can take up to 3 years to be NHL ready. We have a good team and I agree with Stuo players like Clowe-Torres-Ott -Scott will make a big difference. Somebody has to protect Gallagher, he can't keep getting hit the way does--we need a tough forward so they think twice before going after Gallagher.
- Senet1 : Really a heathly Habs team would probably win more games against the Pens that we did against the Sens. Reason they Pens would not play as physical against us as against the Sens. If we get good goaltending we win at least two games.
- zpezada4ok : hello all «link»
- stuo11 : hes a tougher big guy too! Just a minor adjustment but will help a bit
- stuo11 : hes better than markov, and hes french who was in mention for defenceman of the year
- goalie : Markov for Beauchemin - an injury prone d-man for an ;old timer'd-man. Beauchemin is NOT what the Habs need in my opinion. He is a HUGE defensive liability.
- goalie : Stuo 11 I'd make that trade with Oilers fast BUT I doubt the Oilers will make that. Two marginal d-men at the best for a switch of first round picks - not a chance .
- stuo11 : markov for beachemin?
- stuo11 : let moen go
- stuo11 : maybe try and get steve begin back
- stuo11 : we wouldve kicked out all other teams but pens, sens,
- stuo11 : pens have alot of forwaRDS same with us but we have better goaltending
- stuo11 : theres styles of play goalie. Sens played us good, but lost games to southeast teams florida and tampa and get crushed by leafs EVERYTIME. sens and leafsd cant beat bruins but we do frequently
- stuo11 : Diaz weber and our 1st for their first edm
- goalie : SEns beat us 4 games to 1. Pens had last night's game under their control. What does that mean if we were up vs the Pens in a series. I think the Habs have a way to go before we're competing for Lord Stanley's Cup!
- Senet1 : If he could score goals like Lucic and we could sign him to a four year contract then I would consider it too. However, NOT if we only have him for one to two years.
- Senet1 : So we went from 27th pick to 21st pick.
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


March 26, 2009 at 6:20 pm
I feel good about tonight. Tampa always plays well here, but they aren’t playing particularly well defensively, so another 6-3 is possible. I’m actually more confident of NYR and Flo losing tonight than I am of the Habs winning. Atl has been playing well, and except for pp and Tanguay could have won two nights ago. Phi is real and at home. Richards may be the most complete player in the east this year.
Mats N, I like your playoff analysis (game 73), but its way too early for me to make prdictions. I watch a team’s last ten games and get a feel for the team that is not only winning, but skating hard and hitting hard. Those teams are hard to beat, especially in the early rounds. That said, if they started today, Ana knocks of Det in the first round (not that big an upset) Pit looked good last night (both Pit and Cal looked like they’d sweep the current Habs – still 9 to go, though!!)
OK, let’s mobilize our D and strike early and often.
Go Habs!
March 26, 2009 at 10:34 pm
We play a great game, get up by two and them, wham!. Drop the D back, Tampa gets control in our zone, and we almost blow it. We need to keep the pressure on. The D does not have to pinch with a lead, but at least compete for the puck in the neutral zone, close to the offensive blueline. Play away from our zone. Two points are great, but this style is going to kill us. The problem isn’t the players, its the system.
March 26, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Pretty spooky teetering on the edge of this razor blade we’re walking isn’t it?
Win a few, we’re 6th, slip up once or twice and we’re 10th.
The game is coming around…better than it was that’s for sure….getting the 2 points is what matters now I guess. Gotta get that PP going though, and not get tight when a team catches us with a tying goal.
The real stretch to the playoffs however doesn’t start for us until April. The last 6 against bigger, better teams will be our test and will make us or break us.
All in all…makes for some excitement when we want to compete….should be interesting next month to see which side of that razor blade we are gonna find ourselves on.
March 27, 2009 at 12:39 pm
I said after the win against Atlanta that the real test for the Canadiens would come against Tampa, a team that always seems to play Montreal well and has the French-born players who play for their pride even when we don’t. While we did win the game there are reasons to be a little worried about the current state of affairs. I’m not talking about the comeback – that was only a function of our real trouble. The biggest problem that I saw last night was the re-emergence of the futility that was the Montreal powerplay. Yes they scored on the powerplay last night, but when you are given the opportunity to bury a team at this time of year, you must take it.
Some may think that I’m on drugs considering how well the “aspirin” line was passing the puck out there. It really is amazing to watch Tanguay, Kovlev and Markov zip passes through the defense. The problem with that is that for all of our passing, the powerplay became stagnant and immobile which was the most significant contributing factor to our terrible powerplay percentage his season. We abandoned what made us so incredibly successful against Atlanta which was the movement of bodies, not pucks.
Montreal has the potential to have THE most dangerous powerplay in the entire league if they will be willing to move guys back and forth in order to get the goaltender moving back and forth in the crease. Last night, for all of our amazing passes, we allowed Ramo to get set in a position where ONLY the best shots would beat him. It is the same LOW percentage strategy that gave us one of the leagues worst powerplays this season. When we combine our skill with the determination to move bodies into high percentage areas this team will be hard to beat. We can generate powerplays with speed. Good habits are infectious. We learned that last year. This year we have learned that bad habits can ruin even the best powerplays in the league.
Aside from the powerplay I have one final observation: Last season the Habs had an amazing regular season only to flounder once the playoffs started. This season we have endured one of the most painful regular seasons in my memory – and yet, with only a handful of games remaining, it seems as though the proper guys are finding the motivation they need to play well. If this play continues until the post-season, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that the Canadiens could cause some troubles for teams in the Eastern conference. This team has playoff experience. We’ll have to wait and see, but at least Hockey has become fun again in Montreal.
March 27, 2009 at 4:30 pm
While this team still has a lot to improve upon, of course, I disagree with most of the criticisms of their performance against Tampa Bay. Particularly those of the powerplay, which looked incredible for most of the game, and if it weren’t for a couple of goal posts and a couple of–let’s be honest–stellar saves, would have scored them 3 or 4 goals. This is not at all the same dismal powerplay we’ve reluctantly come to expect as of late.
In addition to the revived powerplay, the defensive game as well seemed to be a lot more fluent than it has in recent games. Mistakes were kept to a minimum and Tampa Bay was unable to pressure the defense for longish periods of time, save a couple of instances in the third period, which were no doubt the result fo sitting back a bit on a late 2-0 lead.
Further, they didn’t cower when Tampa Bay asserted itself physically. They hit back (for a change) and created opportunties in the process.
All in all, I found it refreshing to witness a near 60-minute effort from this team. (It was if I was watching a hockey team again.) They dominated the play for such a large part of the game that it honestly should have been one of their most lopsided blowouts in recent memory. And it is my opinion that if they bring that kind of effort for each of their remaining, then they’ll be fine wiht regard to securing a playoff spot.
That being said, there is one crticism that I feel is warranted, and it’s that of the goaltending, namely Carey Price. I realise that it’s difficult to remain sharp when you’ve faced a mere 8 shots more than 50 minutes into a hockey game, but this sort of let down has too often been the case with Price. In fact, last night’s game brought back painful memories of the playoff series against the Flyers last season – a series that the Habs never should have lost. Montreal dominated offensively for so much of that series, in every game, and then Umberger, or whomever else, would get a chance the other way and score every friggin’ time. (I even recall a comment left by a Flyers fan during that series – “See you in Philly. And bring that Price kid with you, will ya?” Indeed the Habs did, and indeed the point was made.) Perhaps staying sharp under such circumstances comes with more experience, but for now, Price is not the goaltender that this team can ride deep into the playoffs. Perhaps Halak can ge hot again at the right time but I’m not confident that he could handle the onslaught of a Boston, Washington, Pittsburgh, or New Jersey in a seven-game series. This position continues to be a huge, gaping hole and a reason for concern.
March 27, 2009 at 9:21 pm
Well I have to agree and disagree with both Joseph and Matts. Firstly, I agree with Matts that if you are going to score you have to move bodies not pucks. If a goaltender can see the puck when it is shot then he will stop it 99% of the time and like last year in the playoffs, we made the goaltender look good by not screening him. The only guy who seems willing to stand in front of the Goalie is Koivu and he got hit with the puck twice against Tampa. He is a small guy and although he can be effective he does not provide the screen that we need. The problem is that we need a power forward willing to do the dirty work like Philly and Boston as Joseph pointed out Umberger is a prime example. I agree with Joseph that we did dominate the game for the most part as well as the power play and we got some good shots from the point, however, without the screen the shots from the point are not going in unless they are either screen shots or deflections. Kovy has a great shot but is hardly ever in the position to shoot the puck. The other night Markov and Schneider both tried to set up give an goes about four times but the forward ignored the play and at least twice they were open for the shot. Instead we kept cycling the puck from side to side and corner to side controlling the play without getting a quality shot.
As for Price, I do not see how you can blame him for either goal that was scored, the second one he had if it was not deflected and the first one, well how many times does a guy get to shot the puck in the slot before he gets knocked on his behind. Price stopped the first shot and then got partially interfered with in the crease and know one took the intiative to protect him or take the guy out in front of the net. The nature of Price’s style makes him somewhat vulnerable to being pushed around while on the ice on his bads, but then again most butterfly goalies have the same problem. Price will learn in time how to protect himself better like Roy did but there is a learning curve with goalies and we have to remember Price is what 20-21 years old we need to be patient with him.
March 28, 2009 at 11:16 am
Donnie: I agree that it was incredibly refreshing to see a complete effort. My criticism only comes because I’ve seen this movie before and I don’t like the ending. This was exactly our problem when all of our troubles began so long ago. Our powerplay LOOKED great. There was dynamic passing and many missed opportunities. That continued until we were so out of sinc that we couldn’t even sustain pressure. If we keep relying on “the perfect shot”, one in which somebody has to beat a goalie who can see the shot, and doesn’t have to worry about re-directions or rebounds – we will continue to have an abysmal percentage. You’re absolutely right, that game could easily have been 4 or 5-2 in regulation had bounces gone our way (as was the case in Atlanta), but we didn’t do ANYTHING the easy way against Tampa Bay. When did we see Ramo have to scramble laterally to make saves? Almost never. He made the saves he was in position to make. I’m sorry to say that it is in fact the same old story. How many times this year have the Habs made some no-name goalie look like Brodeur because of our insistence on creating all of our offense on the perimeter? Atlanta worked because we were able to get guys in the slot for passes and rebounds. I hope the guys get back to that strategy tonight because it is a million times harder to defend than a team that tries to snipe goals top shelf on every attempt.