Game 79: Sens/Habs
-
The Habs are hot at the right time. 5-0-1 in the last six.
How can the powerplay continue to be so efficient without Andrei Markov and Mathieu Schenider? They will miss at least tonight’s game, possibly more.
Two points tonight become more important as the Rangers will be desperately fighting for their season tomorrow.
Related
The fate of the Canadiens seems to be decided this morning after their failure to close last nights game in Buffalo.
Typical of band...
The Canadiens are in Philly tonight and with a win they can nail down 5 out of a possible 6 road points to start the season.
Guy Car...
What can you say about a guy like Michael Ryder? If you don't know how I feel about him refer to my past posts and getting him re-signe...
There are currently no tags for this post.
5 Comments
ShoutBox
Last Message 5 hours, 46 minutes ago
3 guests are online.
- Margahayuland : hi all... sorry add this «link»
- Senet1 : I want the Bruins to win anyway so that we pick ahead of them in the Draft.
- Senet1 : Muller you got your wish NYR won game 4. So the Bruins will have to play another game at least.
- Senet1 : He may just bring all three of the kids up.
- muller93 : MB is forced to go out and get a big D-man. Missing Emelin for almost half the season is the last thing we needed to hear. Now going out and getting a big D-man is a MUST!!!
- muller93 : Now for the Fu**en Bruins who have no business even being in the second round are going to get a nice rest. Yes the same goons who took out one of best D-man for 6 more months. There is NO Fu**en justice. Just venting--Ok i feel better now.
- muller93 : So pissed to see the Rangers lay down and play like total crap. How did the Rangers beat the Caps? This team is playing with no heart--a must win and can only muster 23 shots...PATHETIC !!!
- muller93 : Senet I did see Galchenyuks goal--Made a great move for the game winner. You can see the kid has so much confidence.
- goalie : If Rangers get swept I wonder if Tortorella will get his walking papers? Or Glen Sather? They have tons of 'talent' but zero wins in this series.
- goalie : It's really too bad we lost to the Sens as we would have played the Rangers and the way NYR are playing we would have beat them too. If only. If only!
- Senet1 : Actually I agree it was a good move for them to play a shorter season and get the experience. He could not have played in the minors this year he would have had to play junior or the NHL. However, he now has a year under him and knows what to expect next year and hopefully take a bigger responsibility on the team. Did you see those two goals in the bronze game? Wow.
- muller93 : Good move by the Habs not having Galchenyuk play in the minors. Now Galchenyuk has 1 year in the NHL and playoff experience this is going to pay off big time come next year.
- Senet1 : Galchenyuk scores to back to back goals in shoot out to help USA win Bronze metal. I did not see the second goal but the first was a beauty.
- Senet1 : So we could pick anywhere from 25th to 23rd depending on who wins these quarter final series.
- Senet1 : First, is the 14 teams in the lottery. Then there are 12 teams that did not make the semi finals in the order of the seasonal finish, Then there are the four teams in the semi final the first two eliminated pick in the order of the regular season points total and the last two based on who wins and who loses the cup. So as it stand now if say Detroit beats Chicago then Detroit moves up to pick after us. Boston or NYR will move up and pick after us. LA or San Jose will move up and pick after us
- Senet1 : Basically, I was wrong about the draft pick situation. There are three groups of drafting teams within the 30 teams.
- Senet1 : seriously ready to challenge for the cup. He will us win games but he will not be the difference between winning the cup and not winning the cup. You pick up players like that once you have the team ready to challenge,.
- Senet1 : I am looking at the players to draft and there are a lot of big 6'3-6'5 forwards available ion the draft this year. If we could draft 3-4 big young players in the 2nd and 3rd round why would you want to give that up for a roster player who may have 2-3 years at best. If we are going to build a winner to have to build it with bigger players and there are a lot of good big players available this year. So you sign Ott and he is with us for the short run, but probably not when we are seriously re
- Senet1 : Boullion is a great mentor for the young D-men
- muller93 : Boullion is one of MBs great additions--Boull ion is a definite Keeper.
- muller93 : Getting rid of Kaberle frees up a lot of cash. Boullion is small but is reliable and doesn't back down from anyone.
- muller93 : Exactly Goalie any thoughts on a punishing D-man?
- goalie : They;re showing determination adn skill vs Ducks and Blackhawks.
- goalie : REd Wings could turn out to be the surprise team of this year's playoffs!
- goalie : WE need to rid our team of Kaberle and Webber. Step two would be to then move Diaz. If we get that big d-man I believe that would push Boullion to # 7 on the chart. We'd then go with Georges, PK,Markov (to continue mentoring Ememlin) Tinordi as our starting six . THEN I'd be excited about our chances. We could then work on getting bigger forwards.
- goalie : I too would gladly give up a 3rd round pick for Ott- the type of player we sadly lack. AND if we could get one more rugged, expeienced defenceman it would help immensely.
- muller93 : Senet what you are saying makes sense but if we can get Ott for a 3rd round I'll take that all day.
- muller93 : MB should be looking at a big D-man first, even though I like our blue line with the addition of Tinordi. We need that insurance just in case one gets injured. Also I'm a firm believer in starting with the goalie first then-defense-for wards-and we already have good goalie. We have all noticed when we have the lead Price is tough to beat.
- Senet1 : So sometimes you have to sacrifice for one year or two to build that team in the draft. then add the finishing touches through FA and trades.
- Senet1 : Muller, Detroit is another good example. They have been in the hunt every year with good well balanced teams yet only one or two cups to show for it. However, they have built a team that has a chance every years for the last 10+ years. That is what I think we have a chance to do this year with a good draft. It reminds me of the habs teams of the mid 80 and 90's we built a team then with sold draft picks and won the cup twice during that time period. So sometimes you have to sacrifice a one
- muller93 : Very true Senet, you do need luck and we haven't had any luck it seems since the habs moved to the Bell Center. We had an incredible run in 2010 with some crazy goal tending from Halak. With Galchenyuk-Tinor di-Gallagher all in 1 year--not too bad, even with an early exit in the playoffs.
- Senet1 : Muller I guess we all have our own ideas, but there has never been too many times that were successful when they traded their draft picks away. We have a chance to build this team so we have a shot at winning the cup over the next 10 years. Even as good as Pittsburgh has been they have only won the cup once since Crosby and Malkin have been with the team. That is because you not only need great players but you need luck to win, but one thing about Pittsburgh they have a chance every year. The
- muller93 : Good point on Torres, he might be a liability. Torres has to tone it down a bit, but that's his game-very aggressive.
- goalie : Though I don't condone what Raffi Torres did - thos shows you how repeat offenders or near offenders are going to be treated. His hit was NOT illegal BUT what the rap sheet adn reputation Torres has he got severly punished. Lesson to be learned by OTHER players because Torres dopesn't learn fromk his mistakes.
- muller93 : Senet normally I would agree with you on not trading draft picks but we are not in a rebuilding stage. Sometimes draft picks can be a roll of the dice and it can take up to 3 years to be NHL ready. We have a good team and I agree with Stuo players like Clowe-Torres-Ott -Scott will make a big difference. Somebody has to protect Gallagher, he can't keep getting hit the way does--we need a tough forward so they think twice before going after Gallagher.
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


April 6, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Well, we finally get to witness the long anticipated debut of Doug Janik, the heavily touted prospect who was a key cog in the Steve Begin mega deal. Haha. Seriously though, hopefully he steps in and we don’t hear his name once during the course of the entire broadcast. That will mean he did his job and didn’t mess anything up.
I’ve mentioned a couple times this year how terrible it would be for the Canadiens to lose Markov, but I never imagined he would be hurt at the same time as Schneider. What a terrible time for Montreal to lose two players who log over 20 minutes of ice time each. Clearly everyone on the blue line will need to step up in the absence of Markov and Schneider. O’Byrne and Janik need to play a simple and low risk game.
Gainey has made an interesting move in bringing up Janik instead of one of the more offensive minded Bulldogs given the hole that will be left in the powerplay. Clearly he feels that Brisebois, Hamrlik and Gorges can pick up the slack on the back end of the PP. We may even see Komisarek out there, given that he has a pretty hard slapshot (even if it does end up hitting the player directly in front of him 90% of the time). The Habs will need to rely on the hard work of the forewards to carry the slack on the man advantage which is not necessarily a bad idea given that Koivu, Tanguay and Kovalev have an insane number of points in their last 5 games.
Ottawa can be a dangerous team, but if we are careful on D and continue to get great work by all of the forward lines, we should still pick up the points.
April 6, 2009 at 2:27 pm
I only hope that the injuries to Markov and Schneider are short lived ones. Indeed, what a time to lose not one but both of them.
Meanwhile, there is a positive in that Gorges appeared to emulate Schneider on the powerplay which followed his injury – a non-hestitant blast from the point. Hopefully Gorges and Brisebois will fire at will tonight, because after all, it shouldn’t matter all that much who’s taking the shots as long as there’s traffic in front of the net.
April 6, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Very true Joseph. I suspect the PP will run from Kovalev at the side of the net for either a cross crease pass or a pass into the slot. the second option if those plays aren’t available will be a blast from the point. My only hope is that we don’t see Breezer try one of his blind D to D passes that seem to be intercepted by the high defender every time. Again, less is more from anyone in a role they are not accustomed to. Do no harm.
April 6, 2009 at 10:37 pm
the important part of the PP is to get the shot on the net so it can be deflected or a rebound. That is what made Markov so good was his shot was almost like a pass and Schneider’s shot most of the time was on the net or deflectable.
April 7, 2009 at 10:00 am
What a time for a giant boot in the n*uts being a Hab or a Habs fan. 2 of these guys lost in a game against the non-playoff bound Leafs…they must be loving it. Truth is guys, this is gonna hurt us soooooo much. Ya know, if we were still playing ugly hockey, I don’t think it would bother us as much…..but to have things just turned around, just when we a heading to the playoffs was great timing. This horrible luck to me means that it just wasn’t in the cards for this 100th season.
Schneider for season ending surgury, and Markov for 3 weeks (which at this point of the season might as well be 3 months for all intended purposes).Sadly I watched the game last night as our PP converted back to the PP of a 28th ranked team. It hurts soo much after the struggles we’ve been and fought through to get here.
What else can I say? This really blows, and doesn’t seem fair at all. The hockey gods really put the kaibosh on this season for us didn’t they. Very saddened and disappointed here…GO HABS GO !!!