Grabovski and Lapierre called up
-
Members of the Canadiens are still suffering from a virus and the lineup today is uncertain.
What is certain is Maxim Lapierre and Mikhail Grabosvki have been called up and will be in the lineup.
Lapierre has had great success in his games with the Canadiens this year sparking controversy when he was demoted back to Hamilton.
Grabovski is a talented prospect and one who should be interesting to watch. Grabovski is small and in the pre-season had his shoulder separated before he could really be observed.
There are no related articles.
There are currently no tags for this post.
26 Comments
ShoutBox
Last Message 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
1 guest is online.
- Senet1 : He may just bring all three of the kids up.
- muller93 : MB is forced to go out and get a big D-man. Missing Emelin for almost half the season is the last thing we needed to hear. Now going out and getting a big D-man is a MUST!!!
- muller93 : Now for the Fu**en Bruins who have no business even being in the second round are going to get a nice rest. Yes the same goons who took out one of best D-man for 6 more months. There is NO Fu**en justice. Just venting--Ok i feel better now.
- muller93 : So pissed to see the Rangers lay down and play like total crap. How did the Rangers beat the Caps? This team is playing with no heart--a must win and can only muster 23 shots...PATHETIC !!!
- muller93 : Senet I did see Galchenyuks goal--Made a great move for the game winner. You can see the kid has so much confidence.
- goalie : If Rangers get swept I wonder if Tortorella will get his walking papers? Or Glen Sather? They have tons of 'talent' but zero wins in this series.
- goalie : It's really too bad we lost to the Sens as we would have played the Rangers and the way NYR are playing we would have beat them too. If only. If only!
- Senet1 : Actually I agree it was a good move for them to play a shorter season and get the experience. He could not have played in the minors this year he would have had to play junior or the NHL. However, he now has a year under him and knows what to expect next year and hopefully take a bigger responsibility on the team. Did you see those two goals in the bronze game? Wow.
- muller93 : Good move by the Habs not having Galchenyuk play in the minors. Now Galchenyuk has 1 year in the NHL and playoff experience this is going to pay off big time come next year.
- Senet1 : Galchenyuk scores to back to back goals in shoot out to help USA win Bronze metal. I did not see the second goal but the first was a beauty.
- Senet1 : So we could pick anywhere from 25th to 23rd depending on who wins these quarter final series.
- Senet1 : First, is the 14 teams in the lottery. Then there are 12 teams that did not make the semi finals in the order of the seasonal finish, Then there are the four teams in the semi final the first two eliminated pick in the order of the regular season points total and the last two based on who wins and who loses the cup. So as it stand now if say Detroit beats Chicago then Detroit moves up to pick after us. Boston or NYR will move up and pick after us. LA or San Jose will move up and pick after us
- Senet1 : Basically, I was wrong about the draft pick situation. There are three groups of drafting teams within the 30 teams.
- Senet1 : seriously ready to challenge for the cup. He will us win games but he will not be the difference between winning the cup and not winning the cup. You pick up players like that once you have the team ready to challenge,.
- Senet1 : I am looking at the players to draft and there are a lot of big 6'3-6'5 forwards available ion the draft this year. If we could draft 3-4 big young players in the 2nd and 3rd round why would you want to give that up for a roster player who may have 2-3 years at best. If we are going to build a winner to have to build it with bigger players and there are a lot of good big players available this year. So you sign Ott and he is with us for the short run, but probably not when we are seriously re
- Senet1 : Boullion is a great mentor for the young D-men
- muller93 : Boullion is one of MBs great additions--Boull ion is a definite Keeper.
- muller93 : Getting rid of Kaberle frees up a lot of cash. Boullion is small but is reliable and doesn't back down from anyone.
- muller93 : Exactly Goalie any thoughts on a punishing D-man?
- goalie : They;re showing determination adn skill vs Ducks and Blackhawks.
- goalie : REd Wings could turn out to be the surprise team of this year's playoffs!
- goalie : WE need to rid our team of Kaberle and Webber. Step two would be to then move Diaz. If we get that big d-man I believe that would push Boullion to # 7 on the chart. We'd then go with Georges, PK,Markov (to continue mentoring Ememlin) Tinordi as our starting six . THEN I'd be excited about our chances. We could then work on getting bigger forwards.
- goalie : I too would gladly give up a 3rd round pick for Ott- the type of player we sadly lack. AND if we could get one more rugged, expeienced defenceman it would help immensely.
- muller93 : Senet what you are saying makes sense but if we can get Ott for a 3rd round I'll take that all day.
- muller93 : MB should be looking at a big D-man first, even though I like our blue line with the addition of Tinordi. We need that insurance just in case one gets injured. Also I'm a firm believer in starting with the goalie first then-defense-for wards-and we already have good goalie. We have all noticed when we have the lead Price is tough to beat.
- Senet1 : So sometimes you have to sacrifice for one year or two to build that team in the draft. then add the finishing touches through FA and trades.
- Senet1 : Muller, Detroit is another good example. They have been in the hunt every year with good well balanced teams yet only one or two cups to show for it. However, they have built a team that has a chance every years for the last 10+ years. That is what I think we have a chance to do this year with a good draft. It reminds me of the habs teams of the mid 80 and 90's we built a team then with sold draft picks and won the cup twice during that time period. So sometimes you have to sacrifice a one
- muller93 : Very true Senet, you do need luck and we haven't had any luck it seems since the habs moved to the Bell Center. We had an incredible run in 2010 with some crazy goal tending from Halak. With Galchenyuk-Tinor di-Gallagher all in 1 year--not too bad, even with an early exit in the playoffs.
- Senet1 : Muller I guess we all have our own ideas, but there has never been too many times that were successful when they traded their draft picks away. We have a chance to build this team so we have a shot at winning the cup over the next 10 years. Even as good as Pittsburgh has been they have only won the cup once since Crosby and Malkin have been with the team. That is because you not only need great players but you need luck to win, but one thing about Pittsburgh they have a chance every year. The
- muller93 : Good point on Torres, he might be a liability. Torres has to tone it down a bit, but that's his game-very aggressive.
- goalie : Though I don't condone what Raffi Torres did - thos shows you how repeat offenders or near offenders are going to be treated. His hit was NOT illegal BUT what the rap sheet adn reputation Torres has he got severly punished. Lesson to be learned by OTHER players because Torres dopesn't learn fromk his mistakes.
- muller93 : Senet normally I would agree with you on not trading draft picks but we are not in a rebuilding stage. Sometimes draft picks can be a roll of the dice and it can take up to 3 years to be NHL ready. We have a good team and I agree with Stuo players like Clowe-Torres-Ott -Scott will make a big difference. Somebody has to protect Gallagher, he can't keep getting hit the way does--we need a tough forward so they think twice before going after Gallagher.
- Senet1 : Really a heathly Habs team would probably win more games against the Pens that we did against the Sens. Reason they Pens would not play as physical against us as against the Sens. If we get good goaltending we win at least two games.
- zpezada4ok : hello all «link»
- stuo11 : hes a tougher big guy too! Just a minor adjustment but will help a bit
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


January 6, 2007 at 1:19 pm
THANK-YOU BOB.
January 6, 2007 at 1:21 pm
LAPIERRE! LAPIERRE!!! Exaclty who we need in our present situation. Someone who is always working beyond his capacity to go for a win. Watch and learn boys.
January 6, 2007 at 3:48 pm
Grabovski looked real good. kind of reminds me of St. Louis,with his diminuitive size, and speed, and ability to score. If he’s anything like St. Louis, then we’ll have alot to cheer about. Glad to see Lapierre back with the habs. Now Bob, KEEP HIM WITH THE HABS.! Please don’t send him back.
January 6, 2007 at 6:39 pm
oh man, not so good!!!! and jersey won today. we have our work cut out for us tomorrow, i’ll say that much for sure. let’s stay out of the box. just curious to see what will happen!!!!! good luck tomorrow. man i can’t beleive this!!! go habs go
January 6, 2007 at 6:46 pm
First off Montreal got ROYALLY SCREWED by the officiating in this game and the last game for that matter. I’m sure the good ole folks at HNIC are happy about this. Chris Higginds gets practically MUGGED in the corner and they call him for hooking!! GIVE ME A F&*%$#ING BREAK!!!!!!!!! A GOAL disallowed that SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED. I’m starting to think that the NHL has something against the Montreal Canadiens. Iam totally PISSED about this game. This piss poor way the NHL hires these bumms to decide games is starting to turn me off hockey!!!
January 6, 2007 at 6:56 pm
What sucked was Souray moving out of the way instead of stopping the shooter. What is with that? Again there was practically no defense. And what is with the pathetic clearing out of your own zone?
I think something really needs to be done about the Leisure World Souray and the Royal Doultan Figure of Ninnima…honestly. This is the NHL, not some damn World Cup playoff where clubbing and mugging are not allowed….hello Bob, Earth Calling Bob Gainey, wake up, wake up!!! your Defense sucks big time!!!!
Don’t penalize the rookies for the crappy work of your overpaid veterans!
January 6, 2007 at 7:35 pm
I have to say honestly that the habs get no respect from the officials.
The opposition can do whatever they want to 1 of our players, and getaway with it, but as soon as we touch 1 of their players, it’s a penalty on us. SHAME ON THE OFFICIALS! they are a DISGRACE to the league. Also, this is the 2nd consecutive game the officials disallowed 1 of our goals, without cause. In this game it really hurt, because this was 1 goal difference game. And what’s with Aebischer allowing a soft goal? I think he’s trying to mimic Huet.Neither goalie is able to play a game without allowing a SOFT GOAL.
Let me not forget to mention our defence, if you can call it that.PATHETIC!
the rangers could, and should have been beaten today. too bad our D, as usual didn’t show up. Would have been better if they had called in sick, because they looked sick, as in horrible. So now we have lost 2 games in a row, again!
Guess what? we are forced to play NJ tomorrow, a team we can’t ever beat. Can you say 3 losses in a row? Aebischer probably will play tomorrow. yes, 3 losses in a row! the important thing I forgot to mention: our 3 goals were scored on the PP, which means we STILL can’t score 5 on 5.
I can’t recall a habs team, ever not able to score goals at even strength.Gid forbid we have a game without PP’s, we’ll be shut out!
January 6, 2007 at 7:46 pm
this just in, brodeur slipped on some ice getting on the bus and rolled his ankle, he’s out for 4 to 6 weeks. nah, but damn that sure sounds good!!!!maybe if we all wish real hard!!!! nah, still problably won’t happen. i don’t think it matters much anyway, i’m calling habs 3 devils 1 tomorrow. hope i’m right!!!
January 6, 2007 at 9:11 pm
Oh boy do I agree with some of you, our defense SUCKS!
You can’t go far with these pilons.
….and the cookie keeps crumbling, see you boys at the bottom.
Great heart and leadership on Kovalev, Higgins and Plekanec, way to step up.
You gotta love that Ryder and Samsonov misses, can’t even hit the f@#$’n net.
Can we please buy a goalscorer, oh god please anyone that can hit the net
ANYONE!
January 6, 2007 at 11:01 pm
I think I would rather see more players from Hamilton, ie. Grabovsky, Lapierre, Kostityn, Danis,Cote, than Murray, Downey, Ryder and Samsonov. They have alot more energy, and give 100% effort, than some of our present habs. also they would cost less money.
Alot of you bloggers kept saying, it’s only 1 loss, but now we’ve lost 4 of the last 5, and don’t really look good. I’m getting worried, thinking that they are starting to crumble like the team we had last year. lots of similarities. Please Gainey, make some changes before we slip back down and barely make the playoffs. Is it possible for Price to play next season for us?
Can’t we put Downey and Murray on waivers? i can’t stand either one, because they are totally useless, and don’t deserve to get the kind of $$ they are getting. Any chance Samsonov will decide to go back to Russia? better still, can we ship him to Siberia?
January 7, 2007 at 1:12 am
Grabovsky is the future now…WOW!!!
January 7, 2007 at 1:58 am
It’s realy strange how other teams can clutch and hook and or trip the hab players and get away with some of it, while the refs call every and any thing or make up **** “eg.take away goals”for mostly none reasons and alter the games as if there’s a fix on.ALSO,shoot the f@#*ing puck a little higher boy’s.
January 7, 2007 at 10:26 am
said this before…..ryder couldnt hit a barn with a tractor….
Grabovski….is better than Lapierre. That being said Lapierre is every bit as important, because nobody on this team can dig a puck out of the corner like he can. He could go into the corner against the Israeli militia and come up with the puck somehow.
Grabby shouldve had two goals this game.
Even Yvon and Pierre ( rds team ) looked at each other in disbelief at the refereeing in this game with jaws on the table in front of them. Right now, if one of the habs sneezes on the ice he will get two for attempting to injure and two more for delay of game for trying to clean it up.If they follow that up with a cough they will get an additional ten for talking back to the ref.Heaven forbid if one of them were to throw up, it would probably be reviewed by the league.
Kovalev is a force. Period. He is phenomenal. He makes 5 -7 excellent plays a game that create a scoring chance.Then if he makes one pass that is intercepted the Kovy bashers jump on him.
The habs will be alright and this will be looked back at, as their bad stretch this year.
Not sure they have the horses to beat Jersey today. They still are run down and sick ( collectively), but they will snap out of it.At least 5 of the players who didnt miss the game have the flu ( ie Markov and Lapierre)
Izzy…..out.
January 7, 2007 at 10:48 am
Kovalev leads the habs with 60 penalty minutes! not a good stat. let’s see which hab team will show up today? koivu and Latendresse should be OK to play.
Maybe Brodeur will come down with the flu. wishful thinking.
January 7, 2007 at 11:56 am
After yesterday’s game, I’m starting to wonder about the team. Once again, they were totally dominated in a period and barely got any shots off… not the way to score goals. The flu isn’t an excuse when you consider they’ve been doing this for a couple of weeks. I’m never going to say panic, but some line changes and other shake-ups are needed.
January 7, 2007 at 12:04 pm
Disappointed in the results, but not how these guys played through adversity. Young looked good. Jiped us of another goal but it did not stop us from playing the rest of the game. Looked like the gas ran empty toward the end but they did give up which gains some respect in my book…
Maybe we can surprise NEw Jersey coming off a win and expecting a flu ridden Canadien team to be a easy win. Today we need to score on Brodeaur early and often!
High 4 Habs – putting Downey and Murray on waivers although would free some $$, I think they both make near league minimum. My vote would to put Nimiina on waivers, he makes more than both of those guys combined … Maybe all three should go, and then we could rotate the array of talent from AHL with a weeky rotation to keep them fresh & motivated! Seems whom ever they bring up they seem to make an impact…
GO HABS GO
January 7, 2007 at 12:29 pm
To all the naysayers and “trade this trade that” people, can I make a suggestion. Between a loss and the next time you post, take a valium, please.
Izzy: It’s nice to see someone that appreciates Kovalev. The guy is so talented it hurts him. For example, if the pucks leaves his stick once he is lambasted as a slacker. If the puck goes in the net, well finally he’s doing what he is supposed to be doing. Do you think his talent is all natural – he practices and practices puck control between games. I am so glad we got this guy in ’04. About his hook with 7 seconds left in the game. If N.Y. clears the puck the game is over, so Kovy was doing everthing he could to gain control of the puck – and some people label it as a lazy penalty in the offensive zone – geez.
Re: Grabovsky. He showed some real offensive talent and was very fun to watch. But don’t tell me you didn’t notice his weak play in the corners and the blind passes he made that could have come back to bite us. Great debut, but still needs some work.
Re: Aebischer. It would have been a great game for him to step in and play well enough to get us a win. He didn’t. My god on the first goal he was at least a foot too far to his blocker side of the net making it a pretty obvious opening for Cullen. The only shot he didn’t see was the 3rd – he could have stopped all the other 3.
Re: Disallowed goal. It sucked and all, but I think we got a powerplay on that play or just after and scored, so I don’t think it made a huge difference in the end.
Re: New Jersey. We’ve met them in the past few years when we were on serious roles and weren’t able to win – maybe coming in wounded today will help us.
January 7, 2007 at 12:59 pm
You could tell that SOuray and Komi had te flu but was not sure about RIvet because he always plays like ****!
January 7, 2007 at 1:00 pm
Lapierre is a good fourth liner but I guess now we can say he is not the savoiur from heaven.
January 7, 2007 at 1:01 pm
How come Gainey’s been hiding Grabovski (a center, which we desperately need), in the minors? He should have been up a long time ago. Everyone knows we’re desperate for a 2nd line center,and all this time we had one , GRABOVSKI. sure, he’s inexperienced, but look at Malkin. Pitt stuck him in the linup right away, and they already had a good offensive lineup. no excuses! nobody can tell me that Downey and Murray have more talent than that kid.
I don’t understand this organization. Maybe they want to win 2 or 3 years down the road, but they aren’t acting like they want to win it today!
BTW, HABS IN BLOOD: how exactly was Kovalev helping us by continually opening his mouth and taking extra minutes in penalties(several times)?
And if he is so talented(I’m not saying he isn’t),how come he only has 10 goals? and , with all his talent, how come he scored so few goals last year?
There’s something missing with this guy, and everyone in the league knows he doesn’t show up every game, it’s so obvious. Wouldn’t you rather have a player give 100% effort every single game? I would take someone who is less talented, but a bigger heart, not selfish(doesn’t try to hog the puck), and gives 100% EFFORT EVERY SINGLE GAME! But this is only my opinion. personally, I’d rather see half of the team in Hamilton, than what we have.
January 7, 2007 at 1:11 pm
Question is who would you rather have in the playoffs?
Who cares about the regular season.
Don’t worry when the time comes Kovalev will step up.
Last night was one of those moments.
If you ask me last night he carried that team on his shoulders.
January 7, 2007 at 1:13 pm
Grabovski was good, Lapierre was bad and missed his assignment on the first Rangers goal, which was Cullen. The Defence couldn’t skate and Abby had a bad game. I’m hoping the flu contributed to all that.
If the Habs can make it to the All-Star break I think they’ll be OK.
But don’t expect a victory over the Devils. The Habs never beat them.
January 7, 2007 at 6:00 pm
This is what I have been yelling since the preseason. What is with Gainey? Is he on a mission, to make sure the Habs don’t win? All the moves he has made seem to point that way.
And what is with Carbo and his crappy lines and the constant line changes, only Jacque Lemaire was good at that with the old Stars….I guess Carbo is trying to emulate his style…Carbo you gotta get your own style. Look at last year where Gainey used to keep lines on when they were producing.
With Carbo if you shoot on the net you get yanked! and with Gainey if you are a really good rookie called up from the Dogs, and you produce you get sent back down….look at the way Gainey has treated his rookies…shame on you Gainey, how much is George Gillette paying you to make sure the Habs don’t win?
January 7, 2007 at 9:21 pm
Do you read half the stuff that you wright here?
January 7, 2007 at 9:33 pm
Everything will be OK! Inevitably in a long season a team goes through a slump, and fights things a little bit. The lack of a true sniper does gnaw at me a little bit, though. The Habs simply don’t have that guy who producess goals consistently throughout the season. Tney all take turns with mini-sprees like six goals in 10 games, and then disappear for a month. I thought Higgins might be the guy, as he is reAlly has the touch on occasion. Basically, though, the team needs to work hard and fight their way out of this thing. Better days are ahead.
January 8, 2007 at 10:00 pm
More like actually shoot on the net. Oh wait, the Habs know if they actually shoot on the net Carbo is gonna yank them off, or they don’t get enough ice time to actually remember what handling the puck feels like, hmmm, maybe that is why they keep giving it away, they forgot how to handle a puck…..someone needs to also teach Samsonov how to shoot the puck, maybe not on his own net like Souray, or kicking it in like Markov…