ShoutBox
Last Message 22 hours, 23 minutes ago
3 guests are online. Google is crawling the site.
- Senet1 : Actually I agree it was a good move for them to play a shorter season and get the experience. He could not have played in the minors this year he would have had to play junior or the NHL. However, he now has a year under him and knows what to expect next year and hopefully take a bigger responsibility on the team. Did you see those two goals in the bronze game? Wow.
- muller93 : Good move by the Habs not having Galchenyuk play in the minors. Now Galchenyuk has 1 year in the NHL and playoff experience this is going to pay off big time come next year.
- Senet1 : Galchenyuk scores to back to back goals in shoot out to help USA win Bronze metal. I did not see the second goal but the first was a beauty.
- Senet1 : So we could pick anywhere from 25th to 23rd depending on who wins these quarter final series.
- Senet1 : First, is the 14 teams in the lottery. Then there are 12 teams that did not make the semi finals in the order of the seasonal finish, Then there are the four teams in the semi final the first two eliminated pick in the order of the regular season points total and the last two based on who wins and who loses the cup. So as it stand now if say Detroit beats Chicago then Detroit moves up to pick after us. Boston or NYR will move up and pick after us. LA or San Jose will move up and pick after us
- Senet1 : Basically, I was wrong about the draft pick situation. There are three groups of drafting teams within the 30 teams.
- Senet1 : seriously ready to challenge for the cup. He will us win games but he will not be the difference between winning the cup and not winning the cup. You pick up players like that once you have the team ready to challenge,.
- Senet1 : I am looking at the players to draft and there are a lot of big 6'3-6'5 forwards available ion the draft this year. If we could draft 3-4 big young players in the 2nd and 3rd round why would you want to give that up for a roster player who may have 2-3 years at best. If we are going to build a winner to have to build it with bigger players and there are a lot of good big players available this year. So you sign Ott and he is with us for the short run, but probably not when we are seriously re
- Senet1 : Boullion is a great mentor for the young D-men
- muller93 : Boullion is one of MBs great additions--Boull ion is a definite Keeper.
- muller93 : Getting rid of Kaberle frees up a lot of cash. Boullion is small but is reliable and doesn't back down from anyone.
- muller93 : Exactly Goalie any thoughts on a punishing D-man?
- goalie : They;re showing determination adn skill vs Ducks and Blackhawks.
- goalie : REd Wings could turn out to be the surprise team of this year's playoffs!
- goalie : WE need to rid our team of Kaberle and Webber. Step two would be to then move Diaz. If we get that big d-man I believe that would push Boullion to # 7 on the chart. We'd then go with Georges, PK,Markov (to continue mentoring Ememlin) Tinordi as our starting six . THEN I'd be excited about our chances. We could then work on getting bigger forwards.
- goalie : I too would gladly give up a 3rd round pick for Ott- the type of player we sadly lack. AND if we could get one more rugged, expeienced defenceman it would help immensely.
- muller93 : Senet what you are saying makes sense but if we can get Ott for a 3rd round I'll take that all day.
- muller93 : MB should be looking at a big D-man first, even though I like our blue line with the addition of Tinordi. We need that insurance just in case one gets injured. Also I'm a firm believer in starting with the goalie first then-defense-for wards-and we already have good goalie. We have all noticed when we have the lead Price is tough to beat.
- Senet1 : So sometimes you have to sacrifice for one year or two to build that team in the draft. then add the finishing touches through FA and trades.
- Senet1 : Muller, Detroit is another good example. They have been in the hunt every year with good well balanced teams yet only one or two cups to show for it. However, they have built a team that has a chance every years for the last 10+ years. That is what I think we have a chance to do this year with a good draft. It reminds me of the habs teams of the mid 80 and 90's we built a team then with sold draft picks and won the cup twice during that time period. So sometimes you have to sacrifice a one
- muller93 : Very true Senet, you do need luck and we haven't had any luck it seems since the habs moved to the Bell Center. We had an incredible run in 2010 with some crazy goal tending from Halak. With Galchenyuk-Tinor di-Gallagher all in 1 year--not too bad, even with an early exit in the playoffs.
- Senet1 : Muller I guess we all have our own ideas, but there has never been too many times that were successful when they traded their draft picks away. We have a chance to build this team so we have a shot at winning the cup over the next 10 years. Even as good as Pittsburgh has been they have only won the cup once since Crosby and Malkin have been with the team. That is because you not only need great players but you need luck to win, but one thing about Pittsburgh they have a chance every year. The
- muller93 : Good point on Torres, he might be a liability. Torres has to tone it down a bit, but that's his game-very aggressive.
- goalie : Though I don't condone what Raffi Torres did - thos shows you how repeat offenders or near offenders are going to be treated. His hit was NOT illegal BUT what the rap sheet adn reputation Torres has he got severly punished. Lesson to be learned by OTHER players because Torres dopesn't learn fromk his mistakes.
- muller93 : Senet normally I would agree with you on not trading draft picks but we are not in a rebuilding stage. Sometimes draft picks can be a roll of the dice and it can take up to 3 years to be NHL ready. We have a good team and I agree with Stuo players like Clowe-Torres-Ott -Scott will make a big difference. Somebody has to protect Gallagher, he can't keep getting hit the way does--we need a tough forward so they think twice before going after Gallagher.
- Senet1 : Really a heathly Habs team would probably win more games against the Pens that we did against the Sens. Reason they Pens would not play as physical against us as against the Sens. If we get good goaltending we win at least two games.
- zpezada4ok : hello all «link»
- stuo11 : hes a tougher big guy too! Just a minor adjustment but will help a bit
- stuo11 : hes better than markov, and hes french who was in mention for defenceman of the year
- goalie : Markov for Beauchemin - an injury prone d-man for an ;old timer'd-man. Beauchemin is NOT what the Habs need in my opinion. He is a HUGE defensive liability.
- goalie : Stuo 11 I'd make that trade with Oilers fast BUT I doubt the Oilers will make that. Two marginal d-men at the best for a switch of first round picks - not a chance .
- stuo11 : markov for beachemin?
- stuo11 : let moen go
- stuo11 : maybe try and get steve begin back
- stuo11 : we wouldve kicked out all other teams but pens, sens,
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


April 16, 2009 at 9:50 pm
I would’ve liked to have seen them steal Game One, and they certainly were in a good position to do so, but too many missed opportuniteis to gain the lead. That sort of thing plagued them through much of the regular season, and while I was hoping that they’d rectify for the playoffs, they evidently haven’t.
All in all though, an inspired effort by the Habs. And Boston was nervous, despite what they or their fans might say. I guess history has left a mark on them as well.
April 17, 2009 at 9:06 am
Exactly right Joseph…..letting opportunities go hindered this team in the regular season and it’s the same now, and Boston was nervous. For the first time in a long time, I was’nt….no pressure, the result last night is what is supposed to happen. Still, I’m like you Joseph…..I wanted to see us steal one, and last nights game was it. One PP away from this game we were.
As big a fan I am, I have to say now, that this game is the closest we are gonna come to the Bruins this series. Giving them a little scare is all we’re gonna muster. Even in coin flip games like this one, the hockey Gods favor the Bruins this season, that’s it. Now, the Bruins will relax, gain that extra confidence, and start playing the way they did all year…..and she’s over boys. This team has goal scoring 3 lines deep, we don’t have scoring 3 players deep….competing in this sense is only fractional. You can only go so far with a team like this is what I’m saying.
Anyways, good game last night. We are going out with a little respect, and I hope Bob gets busy this summer and starts addressing some of the problems that are harping at this team….cuz boy theres a few.
April 17, 2009 at 11:26 am
Just about everyone in the world of hockey has written off the Habs going into this series, and while there is plenty of room for pessimism on Friday morning, there is also ample room for optimism.
-The team fought back in a game in which they gave up the first two goals instead of the mid-season-type-collapses we have grown accustomed to. They carried the play for much of the second period, as well as the third until Gorges cross-checking penalty.
-They were very physical. Habs outhit Boston 15-8 in the first period which set the tone early. Laraque got in the face of Chara and Lucic while he was on the first line, and Thornton while he was on the 4th.
-By putting Tanguay on the “4th” line with Metro (who had a fantastic game last night by the way), Gainey was able to generate a goal by Higgins. Side thought: At this point Metro has to rank up there with best waiver pickup in memory for the Habs. This guy is all heart and is such a boost to the penalty kill due to his speed and ability to win in the faceoff circle.
-The 1st line was dynamic, although somewhat cumbersome with Laraque on it. Koivu silences all his critics when the playoffs roll around. Anyone who questions him is NOT a fan of the Canadiens. He is one of my all time favorite Habs, and anyone who disagrees with me can look at his multiple hits on big Z lat night as evidence. He is fearless and exactly the type of guy you want wearing the C for the CH for as long as we can keep him. I cant not mention Kovalev’s goal. How many times have we seen this guy blast shots right into the peanut butter (located on the top shelf – go look for yourself). We need more from Kovalev tomorrow – especially on the PP.
-Komisarek and Hamrlik were both monsters in the game last night. Gone were the blundering passes, and back were the physical plays that made us successful for stretches of the season. They were pounded by the Bruins, and yet kept their cool and distributed the puck – and most importantly did nothing to harm our transition game.
Of course with the loss comes a healthy dose of CH brand pessimism.
-Laraque was good on the first line. He accomplished exactly what we needed him to do which wa negate the presence of Zedano Chara on our forwards. It was a lot of fun watching those two huge dudes crash and bang. That being said – BGL is no Tanguay. I can’t help but cringe when I think about seeing BGL come over the boards with Kovalev and Koivu with about 5 or 6 minutes to go in the third. I understand what Gainey was doing – it is solid strategy – but trailing by a goal with 6 minutes to go, you have to reunite a line that had 16 goals in 10 games prior. I think Gainey is 50 times the coach that Carbo was – but in this instance I think he blew it.
- The Habs had the chance to really do some damage to the Bruins psyche last night. If they win last night, all of a sudden the idea that the Habs will always win in the playoffs creeps back in. I still think if the Habs win game 2 they will be in good shape – but now the pressure is on us.
Last thing – Andrei Kostitsyn needs to go back and look at some tape of his games in the past against the Bruins. Where is that confident swagger? Last night we saw fleeting glimpses. Plex and Him need to remember how dangerous they can be when they pass the puck together. Whether D’Agostini or Sergei is lined up beside them, these guys have too much skill not to use each other.
Oh well, good showing in the first game. We need a split in Boston. If we can get that I really think this will be a long series. Maybe if we can sneak a couple wins we can get Markov back in shape. If not, I think the head games start and we won’t be around long.
April 17, 2009 at 6:33 pm
This was Boston’s one win of the playoffs this year. They played as well as they can; we will get better. At home we will not need BGL on the 1st line, we get the match-ups. The Plek line WILL find their groove, and Tanguay is going to give fits to the BBBs. We don’t need to out-muscle them, just out skate them. I wish we were playing back to back games with one day travel, bears can’t catch foxes.
April 17, 2009 at 10:33 pm
Surely you all jest… (I am serious, and don’t call me Shirley)
The Bruins schooled the habs, who then resulted in goonery and cheap-shots.. Like after the Empty netter, eye gouging, and I just left the mens room at Boston Garden, and I could smell what Laroque was cooking in that game.. The Bruins made him look silly when he tried and tried to goad Chara and Lucic, and they just laughed in his face. The Bruins let the Slabs take cheap shots, then burnt them on the Powerplay. There was only 1 official PP goal, but the 2nd goal came 1 second after the PP ended and the fifth man wasn’t even to the play yet.
B’s in 5.
(They’ll lose game 4 when Handy-Manny Fernandez starts in net on game 4 to rest Thomas).
April 18, 2009 at 10:16 am
Not exactly sure how you eye gouge with your gloves on Shirley.. Maybe you should look at the tape. While you’re at it you could stop trolling a place you have no business being. You’re right about Chara not fighting Laraque though, the only time he fights is when he has a clear advantage in weight or a ref is holding down his opponent. He’s lucky Laraque doesn’t ignore his smile and re-arrange his face. It would be worth the extra penalty in my books.
April 18, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Trolling: seeking out a virtual place where there is a high probability that one will find a significant amount of resistence to his or her opinions; stems from feelings of insecurity and/or insignificance in the world; results from the evolution of internet technology in civilised society. also see insecurity, insignificance, ‘instigating’, ‘stirring the pot’, ‘$hit disturbing’, virtual bravery, hiding behind aliases, sociopathic behaviour.
Just messing with you there, Shirley, but you really should find a new hobby. This one is not suiting you very well at all.
April 18, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Shirley sounds like most Americans that do not understand the game or no exactly what is going on. To bad you may have a good team for once, but just remember the cheap shot your guy put on Komesarek from behind last thursday, it remined me of Bertuzzi’s shot from behind that injuried Moore for life. YOur guy was lucky he did not permanently injure Komesarek, or he would have been sitting for a long time. As you know those who live in gless houses should not throw stones.
Otherwise you comments are meaningless and without any bases. So take a hike.
April 18, 2009 at 9:18 pm
By the way, given the history between these teams, I find it hilarious that a Bruins fan would call the Habs cheap shot artists. Ha! That, folks, is ignorance at its worst.