Hot Streak
-
The Habs are hot at the right time, five wins in their last six games has got them tied for the 8th and final playoff spot in the East.
Tonight is another great opportunity to climb higher by beating the struggling Capitals. The Caps have suffered 6 straight losses, and bring their horrendous road record to the Bell Centre tonight.
Meanwhile the Hurricanes have the Sharks to deal with and the Leafs have another date with Buffalo.
With the gap to 6th place being only 4 points, the Tampa Bay Lightning are far from safe, tonight they play the Sens.
It’s not going to get any easier than this and anything but 2 points tonight will be a huge disappointment.
Related
The Montreal Canadiens defeated the Boston Bruins at the Bell Centre this weekend for their 6th consecutive victory. Another shutout fo...
The Canadiens have a season high 4 consecutive wins in a row. The latest coming against Conference leading Buffalo in their own buildi...
The Bruins are hot. The Red Sox just came back down from 3-1 to go to the World Series. The New England Patriots are unstoppable. Sport...
There are currently no tags for this post.
124 Comments
ShoutBox
Last Message 9 hours ago
2 guests are online.
- Senet1 : seriously ready to challenge for the cup. He will us win games but he will not be the difference between winning the cup and not winning the cup. You pick up players like that once you have the team ready to challenge,.
- Senet1 : I am looking at the players to draft and there are a lot of big 6'3-6'5 forwards available ion the draft this year. If we could draft 3-4 big young players in the 2nd and 3rd round why would you want to give that up for a roster player who may have 2-3 years at best. If we are going to build a winner to have to build it with bigger players and there are a lot of good big players available this year. So you sign Ott and he is with us for the short run, but probably not when we are seriously re
- Senet1 : Boullion is a great mentor for the young D-men
- muller93 : Boullion is one of MBs great additions--Boull ion is a definite Keeper.
- muller93 : Getting rid of Kaberle frees up a lot of cash. Boullion is small but is reliable and doesn't back down from anyone.
- muller93 : Exactly Goalie any thoughts on a punishing D-man?
- goalie : They;re showing determination adn skill vs Ducks and Blackhawks.
- goalie : REd Wings could turn out to be the surprise team of this year's playoffs!
- goalie : WE need to rid our team of Kaberle and Webber. Step two would be to then move Diaz. If we get that big d-man I believe that would push Boullion to # 7 on the chart. We'd then go with Georges, PK,Markov (to continue mentoring Ememlin) Tinordi as our starting six . THEN I'd be excited about our chances. We could then work on getting bigger forwards.
- goalie : I too would gladly give up a 3rd round pick for Ott- the type of player we sadly lack. AND if we could get one more rugged, expeienced defenceman it would help immensely.
- muller93 : Senet what you are saying makes sense but if we can get Ott for a 3rd round I'll take that all day.
- muller93 : MB should be looking at a big D-man first, even though I like our blue line with the addition of Tinordi. We need that insurance just in case one gets injured. Also I'm a firm believer in starting with the goalie first then-defense-for wards-and we already have good goalie. We have all noticed when we have the lead Price is tough to beat.
- Senet1 : So sometimes you have to sacrifice for one year or two to build that team in the draft. then add the finishing touches through FA and trades.
- Senet1 : Muller, Detroit is another good example. They have been in the hunt every year with good well balanced teams yet only one or two cups to show for it. However, they have built a team that has a chance every years for the last 10+ years. That is what I think we have a chance to do this year with a good draft. It reminds me of the habs teams of the mid 80 and 90's we built a team then with sold draft picks and won the cup twice during that time period. So sometimes you have to sacrifice a one
- muller93 : Very true Senet, you do need luck and we haven't had any luck it seems since the habs moved to the Bell Center. We had an incredible run in 2010 with some crazy goal tending from Halak. With Galchenyuk-Tinor di-Gallagher all in 1 year--not too bad, even with an early exit in the playoffs.
- Senet1 : Muller I guess we all have our own ideas, but there has never been too many times that were successful when they traded their draft picks away. We have a chance to build this team so we have a shot at winning the cup over the next 10 years. Even as good as Pittsburgh has been they have only won the cup once since Crosby and Malkin have been with the team. That is because you not only need great players but you need luck to win, but one thing about Pittsburgh they have a chance every year. The
- muller93 : Good point on Torres, he might be a liability. Torres has to tone it down a bit, but that's his game-very aggressive.
- goalie : Though I don't condone what Raffi Torres did - thos shows you how repeat offenders or near offenders are going to be treated. His hit was NOT illegal BUT what the rap sheet adn reputation Torres has he got severly punished. Lesson to be learned by OTHER players because Torres dopesn't learn fromk his mistakes.
- muller93 : Senet normally I would agree with you on not trading draft picks but we are not in a rebuilding stage. Sometimes draft picks can be a roll of the dice and it can take up to 3 years to be NHL ready. We have a good team and I agree with Stuo players like Clowe-Torres-Ott -Scott will make a big difference. Somebody has to protect Gallagher, he can't keep getting hit the way does--we need a tough forward so they think twice before going after Gallagher.
- Senet1 : Really a heathly Habs team would probably win more games against the Pens that we did against the Sens. Reason they Pens would not play as physical against us as against the Sens. If we get good goaltending we win at least two games.
- zpezada4ok : hello all «link»
- stuo11 : hes a tougher big guy too! Just a minor adjustment but will help a bit
- stuo11 : hes better than markov, and hes french who was in mention for defenceman of the year
- goalie : Markov for Beauchemin - an injury prone d-man for an ;old timer'd-man. Beauchemin is NOT what the Habs need in my opinion. He is a HUGE defensive liability.
- goalie : Stuo 11 I'd make that trade with Oilers fast BUT I doubt the Oilers will make that. Two marginal d-men at the best for a switch of first round picks - not a chance .
- stuo11 : markov for beachemin?
- stuo11 : let moen go
- stuo11 : maybe try and get steve begin back
- stuo11 : we wouldve kicked out all other teams but pens, sens,
- stuo11 : pens have alot of forwaRDS same with us but we have better goaltending
- stuo11 : theres styles of play goalie. Sens played us good, but lost games to southeast teams florida and tampa and get crushed by leafs EVERYTIME. sens and leafsd cant beat bruins but we do frequently
- stuo11 : Diaz weber and our 1st for their first edm
- goalie : SEns beat us 4 games to 1. Pens had last night's game under their control. What does that mean if we were up vs the Pens in a series. I think the Habs have a way to go before we're competing for Lord Stanley's Cup!
- Senet1 : If he could score goals like Lucic and we could sign him to a four year contract then I would consider it too. However, NOT if we only have him for one to two years.
- Senet1 : So we went from 27th pick to 21st pick.
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Blogroll
RSS


March 26, 2007 at 1:29 am
If we want the Habs to win more in 2007-2008, here’s what I think Gainey has to do:
1) Fire Carbonneau
2) Trade Higgins
3) Trade Koivu
4) Bring a descent goalie (no no-names)
5) Give contracts to the young players
6) Keep Souray
7) Bring a descent or “aggressive” coach
March 26, 2007 at 7:27 am
51 Name,
Thats a great wish list you’ve got there, but most of these things will not happen. Carbonneau has done a formidable job in this first tenure on the job…you have to look at what Gainey has given him to work with, it’s not his fault they have faltered in the second half.
The only thing we can hope for is a strong finish, and hope it gets us in, thats it
March 26, 2007 at 8:12 am
Well boys and girls all of us Habs Fans hate to do this BUT we all have to hope the Leafs beat the Canes on Tuesday night. We need them to in order for us to climb up. We are not getting help which we need so desprately. We probbally not win all of our remaining games (God, I wish that we would) so we need help now.
Isn’t it sad that we need Toronto’s help. A team we dislike with every fibre of our being.
Don’t get me wrong. I will never Cheer for the Laffs. NEVER.
Is hopeing that they win same as cheering for them??????????
March 26, 2007 at 8:17 am
hey 51 NAME….did you say trade Higgins, are you on crack?
give it 2 more years and he will have the “C” on his chest.
March 26, 2007 at 8:24 am
NAME, I agree with your #6.
March 26, 2007 at 8:25 am
I’m hearing that even if we were to win 5/7, we still may not make it in. The dammn Rangers won’t quit winning. We didn’t get the help we needed from SJ Saturday night either. Cross our fingers and pray to Christ this all works out. The way were playing right now, which is HOT…..we could beat the swordsmen right now!
March 26, 2007 at 8:44 am
Name:
re. Post #51 – Who wants to bet that none of those things on your list will actually happen (except #5)– nor should they. With Carey Price in the system, it might be dumb to acquire another franchise goaltender at this point. Also, Souray is going to do what Souray is going to do.
Trade Higgins???? Why!
Carbonneau has also done a “decent” job as a rookie and will be back for next season. A “descent” coach would actually hurt the team — That would be Mario Tremblay.
Now, back to the playoff race… Here’s my theory. There are six teams left for three spots. 92 points will likely get you in. There are two contenders from each division in those six teams. With the play becoming mostly inter-divisional now, the chances are that one representative of the two from each division will make the post season.
Carolina-Tampa Bay: face each other twice — If there is a clear winner of these two games, they are in and the other is likely out.
NYI-NYR: face each other twice — clear winner of those two should advance while a clear loser is likely out
Montreal-Toronto: April 7 — this game might be very important for the post-season.
However, the Habs will need to win almost all of their remaining four point games to advance to the post-season. (NYR X 2, Toronto X 1)
I still believe that they can do it.
March 26, 2007 at 9:00 am
Where there is Life there is hope. I have hope, but not much. The odds are overwhelming stacked against us. IF we do manage to make it to the post season, will we have anything left to give?
I get so disapointed with my Habs, compassion I guess.
WOOF, WOOF, GO HABS GO, WOOF, WOOF…….
March 26, 2007 at 9:05 am
the second half collape is now starting to take affect on this situation. If we had just won even 4 more of those games, this would not even be a discussed issue
March 26, 2007 at 9:13 am
We need for The Canes & NYI’s to loose their next games. If they do, then all we have to do is keep pace with them. Win when they win, if loose when they loose we will be in, cause with a tie for 8th we have more wins.
I know, “IF: is the key word.
March 26, 2007 at 9:38 am
fan4066, in order to win those 4 extra or more games during the mid season was ,if you remember not possible with the play of Huet”backup”, Abby”bush league backup”,Samsonov”egotistical midget puck hawg with crossed eye’s”, Kovalev”a shark that only feeds at the very end of the season”,Niinimaa,”???????!!!”,Dandy and Boullion”NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR THE D ,to bad so sad”,Koivu” where my team go,man I’m beatup!”and Garth Murray-Downey”Go ahead ,punch me out first!” Even The Canadian Institute For The Blind saw that coming!
March 26, 2007 at 9:45 am
Top ten misconceptions in the NHL:
10)Brad Richards is worth over 6 million
9)Calgary is dangerous team this year
8)Vancouver has a good cast to support Luongo
7)Holmqvist is a number one goalie
6)Ryan smyth would guarantee a playoff spot
5)Souray is seriously considering LA in the offseason
4)Justin WIlliams is an all-star
3)Keith Tkachuk is a team player
2)Matt Stajan is a NHL caliber player
1)Alex kovalev is the habs biggest problem
March 26, 2007 at 9:47 am
I have a feeling Tampas not going to make it.
March 26, 2007 at 10:00 am
that’s why I said “if” we had won, 8th would be a shoe-in right now, and there would be no reason to bit our nails
March 26, 2007 at 10:04 am
Snake, there’s no doubt in my mind ,that if Ryan Smyth was a Hab at the start of the year till now instead of Kovalev,we would have as many points as the Sabres! Don’t forget the fact that the Habs tried to build a productive 1st or 2nd line with Kovalev,”Fools Gold” idea, while Smyth can play great with anybody and is an inspiration to all he plays with!Just look at what happened to the Oilers after he was traded!lol…..
March 26, 2007 at 10:21 am
I was really hoping Gainey would go after him, man would he have really helped us, but, there is still this summer, maybe. Better do better than Samsonov this time around….stay away from the europeans and go good ol’ Canadania this time around
March 26, 2007 at 11:26 am
This just in — because I just made it up.
According to my latest calculations which factor in both a team’s last 10 games and their current records, here are the final standings at the end of the season:
#6) New York Rangers — 96.6 points
#7) Carolina Hurricanes — 91.8 points
#8) Montreal Canadiens — 91.2 points
The also rans:
#9) Tampa Bay Lightning — 90.8 points
#10) New York Islanders — 90.3 points
#11) Toronto Maple Leafs — 89.7 points
I hope that these calculations which are accurate to within 1.0 point 19 times out of 20 will help to alleviate any feelings of tension that might be starting to be felt by some Habs fans out there.
March 26, 2007 at 11:39 am
Boy, I hope this “calculation” turns out to be the gospel come seasons end. I really like where those f’in Laffs sit in all this…thumbs up!
March 26, 2007 at 11:43 am
Rob, I hope you are right. What are you, a Mathematician or some thing ??? LOL…..
March 26, 2007 at 11:47 am
Don’t laugh at the LEAFS just yet. We still need there help.
March 26, 2007 at 11:50 am
it would be nice to meet them in that final game of the year, and drive that last nail in their coffin
March 26, 2007 at 12:01 pm
Dawg:
We should ALWAYS laugh at the Leafs! Every single chance that we get.
Also, forget about the Leafs beating Carolina — I think that we should still be hoping that Carolina destroys the Leafs tomorrow night — If Toronto wins, they could be tied with us. Our divisional team to beat for the post-season is Toronto. Hopefully, Carolina can also later take Tampa Bay out of the playoff picture for us.
March 26, 2007 at 12:09 pm
I didn’t look at it that way.
But, if Tampa should beat the Canes ?????
March 26, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Rob,I must correct you on the also rans category,#9 New York Islander-90.8 points ,#10 Tampa Bay Lightning-90.3. Please use more caution when displaying less than points and do you do Tax’s? Wow getting beat out by .2,freeking brutal,if that happens to the HABS….I’M JUMPING !LOL
March 26, 2007 at 12:23 pm
Some interesting notes on the recent habs success.
Souray is even on the +/- scale in the last 6 Wins.
Saku has not taken a penalty in the last 4 Wins.
Halak playing like a #1 NHL goalie since his return from the Atlanta exit.
It’s great to see for a team’s key players stepping it up in this Playoff hunt.
And the young guns with specail thanks coming from the insertion of Kostitsyn.
I hope these games have been a real confidence builder because the real test comes now with the remainder of the schedule is with the majority of the matches are with playoff caliber teams.
Notes;
~Last team we beat currently in the Playoffs: Feb. 22 Predators
~Last Eastern Playoff contender, currently in the Playoff standings: Feb. 2 against Pitt.
~We have had success with bubble teams TB, NYI and TOR… not so good against NYR which we have yet to beat this season in the previous 2 meetings and will face 2 more times.
Our fate is not soley dependant on how we react but how other teams react to this photo-finish eastern battle. Only 1 of our remaining battles is against a team not fighting for a playoff spot or home ice supremacy or Presidents trophy. Even Boston game will be tough after the embarrassment we dished out last week in their building. This back and forth jumping favors teams with a game in hand but if we can continue to play Habs hockey those games against us eliminates games in Hand!
It should be a Fight to the bitter end…
Go Habs Go
March 26, 2007 at 12:36 pm
Oh boys !!! I thought that I knew a bit about hockey. But, you guys make me sound stupid….LOL….
But I bet that I konw more about Dawg food though…LOL….
WOOF, WOOF, WOOF
March 26, 2007 at 12:39 pm
CANADIENS-DAWG – Hopefully not that tanted rat poisoned stuff going around????
March 26, 2007 at 12:44 pm
coutNY_HabsFan:
You are correct, sir!
Bottom line:
The simpler calculation…
If the Habs can somehow eke out four wins in their next six games, they should be in the playoffs with 92 points. The indications from the hockey gods are looking more favorable right now. It seems a stronger possibility now.
As that guy, Izzy, used to say in his trade speculations, I will let you know for sure whether the Habs have made the playoffs on April 8.
March 26, 2007 at 12:47 pm
Hey I’m a CANADIENS-DAWG. That **** can’t hurt me. I ‘m tough errrrrrrrrrrr.
I eat Lightening and **** Thunder……. Although I did eat a few Leafs one time, it gave me an upset belly. Dem buggers are the worst…
March 26, 2007 at 12:54 pm
Rob. #78. How do you figure that?
March 26, 2007 at 12:56 pm
Not sure on what your calculations are derived Rob, but I would gladly use them everyday life if your predictions come true.
Side note we need to change the overtime points system. Teams with fewer wins should not benefit from losing! Playing for ties has chnged the strategy of the game.
2 pts for a straight out wins and OT wins, with the exception of a 1 pt shoot-out victory! This will makes teams want to play every minute of the game…
0 pts for losing!
March 26, 2007 at 1:02 pm
here’s the playoff problem. If we finish the season tied with the same number of points, as say TB or Carolina, then it comes down to wins. If we have more wins, we’re in. But Carolina has 1 game in hand, and TB has won 2 more games than us. Even tho NYR are 3 points ahead of us, we play them twice, and they don’t have any games in hand. Carolina has by far 1 of the easiest schedules, and 1 game in hand. They would have to lose 2 more games than us, because ending up tied with them, we won’t get in. They have 4 fewer losses. TB has 2 more wins than us, so they would need to lose 2 more games than us. Since TB plays Carolina twice, we need 1 team to dominate the other and beat them twice. My guess is Carolina, since TB seems to have less than reliable goaltending. NYI are only tied with us, not actually in 8th place, but still have 1 game in hand. I don’t think they can beat the NYR.(rangers have won the last 3 against them). I still believe that the team we need to beat, are the NYR. We play them twice. So unless Carolina or TB screws up , we will NOT mAKE THE PLAYOFFS! We must win every single game,period! Beating Ottawa or Toronto,and NYR twice, will be very difficult! Too bad Abbyshit lost so many games for us! Looking back, that game in PITT, we would have won(with Halak in nets). And how about those 2 losses in January(with the flu), we gave away points, and I could go on and on, but what’s the point? We have nobody else to blame but ourselves, and now it’s just too late, and we’re running out of games! Let’s hope next season is better, if 1 or 2 UFA’s or trades, and we don’t have to go thru this again!
Oh, BTW, I hope we DON’T RESIGN SOURAY! THAT WOULD BE A TERRIBLE MISTAKE! HE’S HORRIBLE DEFENSIVELY, AND CASE YOU HAVEN’T NOTICED IT, HIS GOAL PRODUCTION HAS GONE WAY DOWN IN THE 2ND HALF,(because other teams have taken away his shot from the point), and he’s not worth 5 million. You’ll see, next season his goal production will be around 12(same as McCabe), and he will still be HORRIBLE DEFENSIVELY, and cost us games, because of his giveaways! There’s no way he will duplicate his goal production, and it would be better for GAINEY to spend that money on a UFA, PROVEN GOAL SCORER!
That’s all. I trust Gainey will NOT offer him over 4.5 million, because of his bad defence. GAINEY DOESN’T WANT TO MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE TWICE!
March 26, 2007 at 1:12 pm
NO!!! None of this Hog Wash.
WIN, LOSS OR TIE. THAT’S IT.
There will be teams that make the post season and teams that will not because of this silly points system.
March 26, 2007 at 1:29 pm
I do hope that they change the point system for next season. If you win, either in regulation, OT, or in a shootout, you get 2 points. The loser , in regulation , OT, or shootout, gets NOTHING! That’s the fair way. It would force teams to play harder in OT.
Another issue, bothering me, is the point system for determining the playoffs!
If a team finishes in 1st place in their own division, division leaders are ranked ahead of any other teams! Now, if a team in another division finishes with more points than a division leader, it’s unfair for them to be below them for a playoff position. I think teams should be ranked according to points, not where they finish, and it shouldn’t be separated, eastern and western conference. Put all the team together,ie, Detroit, then Buffalo, and so on. Nobody cares about east, west matchup for the finals. It should be the best 2 finishers in all the playoffs. We used to use that crisscross system about 20 years ago, and then they changed. Why? It sure would be more interesting and exciting to open the 1st round against Calgary, instead of Buffalo, right? The NHL definitely needs to a) change the playoff format,b) the point system,c) make the schedule more balanced, so we can see more teams from the western conference.
March 26, 2007 at 1:33 pm
Nice posts by Rob(57) and county(75). Might as well throw in my own 2 cents. I can’t bring myself to root for TO, so I gotta go with the canes tuesday. I think it would be a shame if both finalists missed the playoffs this year, but I don’t care either way. Rangers are riding some gems by Lundqvist, who looked dead a few weeks ago, but we play them twice, so I got hope there. Carolina has a sked that looks pretty easy, it’s true, but one never knows which Tampa team shows up. Is it the one with a sieve in net, or the one that has big nights from Lecav, STL, et al? I wouldn’t write off Tampa just yet, if only because of those dangerous frwrds. Plus, they are only a couple out of first in their division.
In the end, like so many of you have already said, we just gotta play our own games, and hope for the best in terms of help from other teams. As the nature of that help seems to change on a daily basis, we’ll likely have new wish lists to send off to udo-voodoo by Friday.
March 26, 2007 at 1:42 pm
*”Habs_INSIDE OUT By Yeats on March 25, 2007 11:45 AM”
“Hey, maybe there is a future for Andrew Raycroft after April 7th?”
I had to share this with my fellow posters… Check out the short film in the right hand corner!
http://attaboy.ca/archives/2007/02/000986.php
Abby might be in this boat…
March 26, 2007 at 1:52 pm
Is it me, cause I can’t see it anywhere.
March 26, 2007 at 2:00 pm
87 CANADIENS-DAWG… IT says click to play. Not sure on the Bandwidth requirements… May have to be patent? Or have Broadband? Sorry Not sure…
March 26, 2007 at 2:35 pm
coutNY_HabsFan, I think Clark the canadian goalie is better than Abishit!lol
March 26, 2007 at 2:36 pm
coutNY_HabsFan:
That video on “Clark, the Canadian Hockey Goalie” (post #86) was fricken’ hilarious! However, I think that Raycroft would be charged with too many errors at shortstop. Abby might also be better trying the soccer version of this video.
March 26, 2007 at 2:59 pm
84 R habs 4 real
If I understand correctly about your playoff system, your talking about the 79-80 season where they played 1-16? I really liked that playoff format as well, but the leaguee didn’t. so that is when they started using divisional playoff formats. It was used to cut way dwon on the travel and time zones for TV scheduling. So they sort have met half way on doing it with the current scheme. It’s still way better than watching Montreal- Boston every round 1 of the playoffs…..remember that **** in the 80′s….Montreal/Boston…..Montreal/Boston….boring!!!
March 26, 2007 at 3:05 pm
What’s boring about Kickin Bear ***.
Get it. Bear ***………
Thank you I’m here all week.
March 26, 2007 at 3:50 pm
The three point games are hurting teams like the Canadiens but I disagree with a couple of points here where some people are saying that no points should be awarded to teams who lose in overtime or a shootout. If we go to that system, then why bother going to overtime? We can just go back to the the 40 years from 1943-44 to 1982-83 where there was no sudden-death overtime and if you were tied after regulation, it ended in a tie. I think they should maybe award 3 points for a regulation win, 2 for an overtime or shootout win and 1 for an overtime or shootout loss. The system we have right now has increased parity across the NHL and made the NHL much more exciting to watch. I hope they continue this because parity is what I want!
Ziman
March 26, 2007 at 4:01 pm
The game of Hockey is going right down the *******. They are ruining the game with all these rule changes and stuff.
WIN, LOSS & TIE. THAT’S IT. DAMNIT.
March 26, 2007 at 4:21 pm
ziman 93 – I agree and like that system, but it was out-of-favor with the league and most of the GM’s because it was feared too complicated and discourage new fans from following the point race.
Not sure it is correct that the current system has increase parity among the NHL. How does lightening up play or taking less chances toward the game to ensure a point add excitement? And if you take away, “what I call the Cheap point” take away from the game. I my system teams would play harder in regulation and overtime because the shootout would be a less desirable win. Teams should be rewarded for beating teams not for holding on during regulation. The system would still have the odd 1 pt for separated out for as a WIN/TIE which is not much more complicated than current system. We already iknowledge the Shootout victory is less because it does not count for or against the individual players stats, why should it count against the other teams. I do not think we should make the shootout such an important focus on the game. And definately not to focus for the losers gaining points.
Why should teams such as NYI or TOR who have 3 less Wins current, be tied with the same amount of points? NYR are 3 points ahead 6th place with same amount of wins?
Reward winning not for lasting long enough to pick-up the ‘Al-Cheap-O point is what I say.
March 26, 2007 at 4:26 pm
#95 post – 3rd Paragraph was a caomparison to the Habs points FYI
March 26, 2007 at 5:51 pm
ROB….
Izzy still reads here….
he still reads.
he will be delighted that you remembered. ( still see him often)
Habs will win 4 of the last 6…..hope thats enough.
March 26, 2007 at 7:15 pm
Guy’s:
Kind of off topic,but I’m sure that everybody on here has heard the CBC has signed a new 6 year contract extension. Not really great news if you are a Hab fan but better than if CTV/TSN had the rights to saturday night hockey because they are TOTALLY infatuated with the Leafs. So it will probably be more of the same Leaf garbage every saturday, but they will doing live streaming of games on the internet as well I also heard that CBC will not have the rights to as many Leaf games as they used to (TSN wants more Leaf games,they can have em)so maybe those morons at the CBC will in the future, show more Hab games.
Anybody want a good laugh, go to globesports.com and read the comments about the CBC HNIC story. People are tearing a HUGE strip of Ron, Don et al, even the people of Toronto no less. HNIC needs a complete makeover NOW!!!
GO HABS GO!!!
March 26, 2007 at 10:41 pm
Thanks HABMAN, I just gave them my two cents too ,I basically told them to give me back my tax dollars if all they are going to showcase is a team that has not won a cup in 40 years called the LAFF’S!LOL
March 26, 2007 at 10:43 pm
Kovalev is still a piece of **** !!!
I hear ya when you say this is the time when he comes alive….well my feeling is, that if that is the case-why has he not come alive already…TO GET THE HABS INTO THE PLAYOFFS.. yeah I know 2 goals the other night..but you know what??? Kovalev is still a piece of **** !!!!!
As much as I love the Habs, if they miss the playoffs and Kovalev is gone for next year..it’s worth the sacrifice….. I’ll just look at my Habs tatoo
all summer and look forward to the next season.
We def need some help from the other teams if we are going to make it, problem
is those other teams we need the help from are also winning..Bummer !!