Mike Ribeiro Signs New Contract
-
The Montreal Canadiens have signed controversial Mike Ribeiro to a 1 yr contract.
70% of Canadiens fans on this site believe Ribeiro should have been traded or tossed aside but the Canadiens management apparently felt he deserved another year.
Financial terms have not yet been disclosed.Ribeiro was in the dog house for much of last year and entertained himself in the press box on several occasions as a healthy scratch. Ribeiro’s numbers were far from impressive but worst was his attitude which has frustrated coaches and management.
Why keep Ribeiro around? Do the Canadiens think he can turn it around and really perform or is this just a temporary hold until they can deal him?
Either way the 1 year deal indicates they Habs don’t have much long term confidence in him.Michael Ryder has filed for arbitration and the Canadiens just tied up another small piece of the Cap on an underachieving undersized attitude problem.
- Senet1 : Also the addition of Blunden and even Leblanc is not shy to throwing body checks. Also PK has been more aggressive lately
- Senet1 : That is partly because of the change in coaching styles and the addition of Bourque.
- Senet1 : If we kept Plekanec and Bourgue then we need a shooter on that line. So to me from a forward standpoint we need to add a goal scorer, but one who goes to the net and is not knocked around. To me based on our offence this year that is the most needed position to fill on our forward lines. When you consider that we got ride of Cammy, and if we trade Gionta and Gomez disappears we are no longer a small team. The team has more grit now than at the first of the year.
- Senet1 : So we have to add some muscle as well as skill to our second & third lines and upgrade our fourth line as well. I could see Leblanc moving in as the centre on the second line if we got something good Plekanecs, otherwise, he could play the wing on either the second or third line. Blunden seemed to score faily well in the AHL not sure if he has it in him but would like to seem him on a line with Eller and maybe Leblanc next year all three players like to use their bodies and therefore should be
- Senet1 : Not counting Markov if he plays. If we trade or let go of our UFA defenceman then we will need at least three D-men, I would like a good look at Nash to see if he can play at this level. If not he is gone, I do not think any of our other defensive prospects are ready quite yet. Our junior and college players should be coming on stream for Hamilton next year so we will get to see how much they have developed and whether any are ready for the big time.
- Senet1 : While I agree we have quite a few players that could be made available, I do not see a need to make wholesale changes only the necessary one. obviously Gomez, Gionta, AK46(if he will not sign) I keep our top line of Cole, Pacman and David. I keep Eller and Leblanc, Blunden, Bourque, probably Plecanec unless we can really improve on his positin. I keep PK, Emelin, Gorges, Diaz and Naturally Price. Probably Budaj. That basically gives us two functional line and two sets of defence, not counting
- goalie : Great to see Pacs gets su=ome success after the devestating dirty check last season that could have paralyzed him for life.
- goalie : Given ho the team has played this season one thing in our favor is that we pretty much need to clean house. Other than about 6-7 guys everyone else would be available in my mind.
- goalie : After how the tes]am has
- Avatar37 : Apparently only one offer for Carter on the low side so far, I think Montreal would be foolish not to investigate the possibility of a trade for him, and if there is low interest, the deal might be able to include moving Gomez. Gomez/Darche/Cam poli and a third round pick? Maybe not, but I'd be in serious talks with Columbus right about now.
- Avatar37 : «link»
- Avatar37 : for him had we held on to him until now and created a bidding war. There are more buyers than sellers currently on the market and it would have been the perfect time to have traded him.
- Avatar37 : Goalie - I'm not sure how we could have obtained more for Halak. We showcased him, everyone knew he was available for trade, and in the end, we took the best offer. Any asset is only worth what a purchaser will pay for it. The Halak trade wasn't like the Cammalleri trade where you had GMs afterwards saying they didn't even know he was on the market. The Halak trade was done properly, the Cammelleri trade was a knee-jerk panic move, and while my opinion is that we could have received more
- Avatar37 : I saw the game, the Islanders first goal came from a shot that was clearly above the height of the crossbar. How is it possible for a play to go to review where they have the advantage of mulitple camera angles and the ability to pause and they STILL get the call wrong?
- goalie : I agree don't get dilusional over our three game winning streak. Changes MUST be made. I am however, glad to see the effort being put forth by the players.
- Mats Naslund : I just went to capgeek to see who the Avalanche might be dealing for a rental - and I see they have only 6 players signed for next season!!! There are a couple young D men on that squad who are RFAs who would do very nicely next season.
- Mats Naslund : One thing I know - the 3 game winning streak had better not get PG thinking about holding onto guys for a PO run. Trade them, build the value and move on to next year.
- Mats Naslund : How about Max Pac though.. 21 goals and on pace for 65 points this year. That is absolutely monster for a guy at his age/experience and especially coming after a horrific injury. Huge cornerstone moving forward. On pace for 33 goals.. could he get 35?
- Mats Naslund : Didn't get to see it either - and while I don't really care about the win, I am very glad that Gomez scored so we don't have to endure all of the negativity in the media about him for the rest of the year. He still su@ks, but at least it won't be a topic every shift he takes.
- goalie : Didn't get to see the game at all but it's great to see Pacs get a hat trick and fpor Cole to be + 3. When was the last time this team won three games in a row? Great victory -looks like they're giving 100% effort!
- Senet1 : 4-2 win habs
- Senet1 : Gomez scores, Yea!!!
- goalie : As I said yesterday it will be interesting to see what our lame ass GM gets for players he ships out. Bourque is good and he'll help us but I still think we could have gotten more for him and for Halak when he was traded.
- Avatar37 : round those picks occur (probably 3rd).
- Avatar37 : An interesting article. If we slip to the 5th or 7th draft pick, a very interesting case could be made for drafting Galchenyuk. If we wind up with the second or third pick, I'm not sure who I'd draft, because clearly Yakupov is going to be drafted first overall. Our second round pick also becomes interesting, I know I'd take Vasilevski if he were still available. It will also be interesting to see if we can turn some of our veteran players (Moen, Gill, Campoli) into draft picks, and what
- Avatar37 : «link»
- Avatar37 : That is why PG should have waited on trading Cammalleri. Right now, there is a high demand for a top 6 forward, we could have gotten much more than Bourque in return. That isn't a knock against Bourque, but a knock against a knee-jerk reaction trade that didn't maximize our return on a top asset.
- Avatar37 : «link»
- Avatar37 : chips fall where they may. After all, the only difference between finishing 17th and 29th is how good a pick you get in the draft.
- Avatar37 : We currently sit in 26th place in the league. We are 15 points ahead of Columbus, it's safe to bet at this point they will place last. We are, however, only 4 points ahead of Edmonton so it's still wide open as to who is going to finish second last. I still think that it's time to sit the veterans, play the youth, let them get experience, and regroup for next year. I'm not suggesting deliberately tanking like the Penguins, but give all our young players lots of playing time and let the c
- Avatar37 : goalie - If it were not for the play of Cammalleri, we would never have made it out of round 1. Cammalleri played as big a part, if not bigger, than Halak did. Sure, Halak played well, but remember the team collapsed in front of him, making his job much easier. We had lots of blocked shots and the ones that got through were typically from the outside.
- Senet1 : Goalie you are absolutely right, of course the one thing we had the two previous years that won the games that we are losing this year was our power play. If you look at say 10 games that we should have won had we had a similar power play, again we would not be having these conversations. When your PP goes from first to last in the league that is a lot of goals.How many games have we lost this year by one goal. Again poor management who did not prepare for Markov's possible absence.
- goalie : I'll put it another way.... we need more players who are willing to get their noses dirty.
- goalie : Two years ago when our goaltending stole series adn our players suddenly scored the coaches / GM believed that that was our true team . Well time has proven that was not. Though I was very glad to see the Habs knock off some very good teams we were very fortunate. And fortunate that spring was spelled HALAK!
- goalie : The wrst mistake management could possibly make I believe is to say, we played well some games and we believe the team can play to that level more often in the future. This team CANNOT adnb DOES NOT play to a high enough level. Please do not kid yourself mamngement. hat is partially why we're in the lace we are.
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005


July 6, 2006 at 3:22 pm
Sounds like a very poor move on Gainey’s part, what’s he up to? One scenario: Ribs wants to stay in Montreal and takes less than he might otherwise be worth to stay here. That makes him MUCH better trade bait!! Otherwise, I simply cannot figure it out — it’s not as if he contributed.
July 6, 2006 at 3:34 pm
As you say, it might be that Ribeiro really wanted to stay and lowered his price. Every year the canadiens have trouble finding out what to do with the Ribeiro case. For a guy who had 70 point the season before the last and who (despite behaviour problems) has shown some fast talent, it may be an ok deal short term. He is unpredictable enough and may have a good season. Otherwise, he can be traded before february.
July 6, 2006 at 4:13 pm
NO, NO, NO, NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
July 6, 2006 at 4:53 pm
I thought that Ribeiro was a goner. I guess this is his last chance in Montreal. If he doesn’t perform, he will be condemned to having to listen to the retarded US national anthom before every game.
July 6, 2006 at 5:02 pm
Bad,bad mistake on Gainey’s part, in resigning Ribeiro! He’s a cancer in the locker room! His attitude will spread amongst other canadien players, and cause alot of dissention in the locker room. What is Gainey thinking? If we were going to trade him, he wouldn’t have been resigned. MISSED THE BOAT AGAIN! All the other teams are getting stronger, and we’re getting weaker!This season is a loss!
July 6, 2006 at 6:41 pm
UPDATE: $1.9 Million
I think that’s a little high for what he is right now.
If Ribeiro is worth nearly 2 mill Michael Ryder must be worth 4.
July 6, 2006 at 7:25 pm
Nobody wants to play in Montreal…Gainey’s just happy to have some warm bodies to fill out the line up.
Ribero has some talent, if he would just grow up and start to use it, Gainey could look like a genius.
A trade would be interesting, get a proven scorer (Simon Gagne would look real nice in a Habs jersey…), but I don’t think any GMs out there really want the Mickey Ribs from last season.
That’s just what I think…
July 6, 2006 at 7:57 pm
As an American Habs fan I resent the “retarded US national anthem” remark…..as for Ribeiro…He will be gone.
July 6, 2006 at 8:31 pm
I can’t stomach Ribeiro either, and 1.9 mil is way too much for this flakey flake of a flakester, but.. I believe Gainey is buying a bit more time on Ribeiro. It’s not like Gainey doesn’t have the cap room to experiment with this after the dead FA period. Ribeiro has to realize this is his last shot as a second line centre, doesn’t he? The Dorkinator does show flashes of amazing potential from time to time and does display a good sense of creativity on some rushes. I just hope the guy puts it all together for one season, or at least a half season and they get something for him. You can’t afford to just develop talent and then cast it off for nothing, so I have to believe Gainey is buying a bit more time before he has to make a decision. That’s the only thing that makes sense to me..
July 6, 2006 at 8:37 pm
I believe that Bob knows more than I do about what options the Canadiens have in building a team. I dont understand the signing. It would be interesting to have Bob explain to the media what is going on with the Free Agency market and the habs
July 6, 2006 at 10:36 pm
Boy did Bobby really blow it this time. Ribeiro says he’s trying to mature but I don’t buy it. Gainey only brought him back as an insurance policy in cas Koivu dosen’t come back I think.
July 6, 2006 at 11:18 pm
It has been announced that the Canadiens have signed forward Mikhail Grabovsky from Dynamo Moscow. Link: http://www.topix.net/nhl/montreal-canadiens
July 6, 2006 at 11:19 pm
I have a better trade for the Canadiens. let’s trade Bob Gainey For Kevin Lowe or Brian Burke! Wow! What a great mastermind of a GM we would have!For the Canadiens-no news is bad news!
July 6, 2006 at 11:47 pm
I’ve got to admit close to 2 mil is high, but there seems to be serious salary inflation going around. That said, signing Ribiero for a year at two mil is no lose for the habs. The fact is he’s gifted on the power play and is one of the only second unit guys who can move up if a key first unit guy goes down to injury. That said, if he gets hot he’s trade bait and if he puts in another year like last year, he’s probably moving to Colorado.
July 7, 2006 at 12:03 am
A general comment,
Most big free agent signings are busts. For every Pronger to Edmonton there are multiple Gonchars. And Edmonton still only got one year. When Gainey brought Hull to Dallas, he was roundly criticized and yet it was Hull’s ugly goal that won that team the cup. Indeed I would say it’s hard to argue that Gainey isn’t the single most important factor in the transition from perma-loser North Stars to playoff-fixture Stars.
In terms of legitimate top prospects, the franchise is twice as deep as it has been in a decade, and is now producing new talent like only a few other clubs. Especially in a salary-cap world, the best teams know how to build from within first and hire elite talent second. We have one player going to arbitration, and no kidding Ryder wants a big raise, but I don’t think arbitrarion is going to break the bank. He’s a great finisher with, so far, a one-dimensional game any team would be happy to pay for. But he’s going into his third season and he makes very little impact on the game unless he’s got the puck. My guess is 3 mil, 3.5 for a multi-year.
July 7, 2006 at 1:10 am
Lol BullSmith, send all the failures to Colorado!
July 7, 2006 at 1:12 am
I honestly think that the move Gainey did with Ribeiro was smart.
1. He can now use Ribeiro for a trade
2. Ribeiro is actually a very talented player, all he needs to work on now is shooting more
3. He had 50+ points last season..with only one goal less then Koivu.
4. He also had the 3rd most power play goals on our team last season and he is still a young player with more to learn. I think if Gainey keeps him for next season he will be a strong player on our team , and will do well .
GO HABS GO
July 7, 2006 at 2:45 am
Source : Mix 99.7 FM Radio Station
The Montreal submit a 5 years / 25 Millions dollars offer to Simon Gagne.
The Habs will have to give in compensation to the Philadelphia Flyers : Two First Round draft choice, One Second Round Draft Choice and One Third Round Draft Choice.
Over 5 millions per years, it cost 4 FIRST Rounders…
July 7, 2006 at 8:42 am
Hey guys. I’ve never seen such negativity towards any GM. First off, remember we are all Montreal fans. Second, Gainey’s on the right track. He’s not going to trade a player that has little value and get nothing in return. The upside on Riberio is that he had a bad year last year. I believe that he will score more than 20 goals this year. And don’t forget we were a high-stick away from putting out the championship team. They themselves admit that “we” were the toughest opponent they faced. I remember years ago when GM Sevard was forced to trade a couple of players to Philidelphila because the fans were screaming for it. All these know-it-alls and what happened? We got our butts kicked by these two players every game we played them. Gainey is not going to be bullied. He will take his time and build this team, which by the way is one of the youngest teams in the NHL. He will sign Ryder. He will sign Higgins. He will make the appropriate trades. Right now there’s nothing he can do with Aebischer but I believe he is a good goaltender and under the pressure of Montreal he did start slow. But he’s not a flash-in-the-pan and he is a quality back-up for now. Be patient. Watch what Gainey has to do.
July 7, 2006 at 12:11 pm
From Justin: “It has been announced that the Canadiens have signed forward Mikhail Grabovsky from Dynamo Moscow.”
Clicked on the link:
“…with his lack of size (5-11, 180) and ineffectiveness in physical play as his primary shortcomings.”
A trade must be in the works…this guy could be Ribero’s replacement!
July 7, 2006 at 12:54 pm
LOL Alestar
July 7, 2006 at 8:36 pm
All you Gainey lovers think all is fine in habs land. It’s not! What if We don’t sign or trade a single player? what then? Do hab fans want to see boring, non scoring players like Bonk, or Zednik, (with their non finish rushes), for another year, honestly? Bonk is a very expensive player, who can’t score! We don’t need him! Package him and Zednik, for Lecavalier. Trade Souray for a defenceman, who won’t be deked out of his skates(remember Spezza’s goal), and can leave his marital problems off the ice.If we get rid of Bonk and Zednik, much more cap room. In December, when teams start to fade, and drop salaries, pluck their talent, at bargain discount prices. A trade is imminent for the habs. I’m sure of it, simply because Gainey knows he has holes on offence and defence, which must be addressed, or we’ll be out of the playoff hunt come December! Give us something to cheer about! What about Bob?
July 7, 2006 at 9:39 pm
One problem canadiac,
If we get rid of all these players who’s gonna play for us?
It seems like nobody wants to play in Montreal. All these rumors and nothings happening.
July 7, 2006 at 9:41 pm
Bob Gainey signed Mikhail Grabovsky already. He is a very talented left winger. In his last 73 games he scored 33 times and had 38 assists. That is 71 points!
http://www.eurohockey.net/players/show_player.cgi?serial=44685
There are rumours about negotiations concerning Sykora, Tom Poti, and Simon Gagne.
Be patient.
July 7, 2006 at 9:52 pm
Did anyone ever think that if we don’t want Ribeiro, Bonk, Zednik, Bulis, Sundstrom or whtever other players names have been thrown around out here, Maybe nobody else wants them either. With what we have to offer as trade bait Gainey’s job is anything but easy. I am sure Gainey would trade Ribeiro, Zednik, and Souray in a second for a player of Lecavliers talent but do you honestly think Tamps Bay is really that stupid. Give Gainey a break, he can only do so much with the cards he has been dealt.
July 8, 2006 at 11:46 am
I agree we should lay off Gainey. That goes for Souray as well. I don’t think that all the negativity going around (just because 10 days into free agent season nothing happened) will attract anyone to Montreal. Gainey is one of the top GMs in the league. Souray is a 1st class defenseman, one of the best we’ve had for years, who’s had a hellava time adjusting to the ‘New NHL’: but I’d rather have him than most other NHL defensemen (Pronger can go to Disneyland, we know hockey here!).
I can see a real contender of the future being built, lots of young talent and a few excellent veterans for strong balance. Yes, there are major gaps: but don’t you guys think that with his many years playing, managing (and now coaching) experience, Gainey doesn’t know that too!!!??? Signing Ribs is a shock, but for according to the many rationalisations being thrown out there, there are several possible logical explanations.
Apart from a few cynics, most appear convinced that this is a team that(for the first time in DECADES) is building a champion for the future, maybe not for tomorrow, but certainly 2-3 years down the line… with some great hockey in between.
That said, it would be great to see a solid 40-50 goal scorer on a first line with Kovalev (Higgins, Ryder and Koivu are an excellent 2nd line, one of the best in the league). Where that leaves the $1.9 million dollar gangsta man, I just don’t know…
July 8, 2006 at 2:16 pm
jack that is one of the best post i have read in along time.You hit the nail right on the head.
July 8, 2006 at 6:27 pm
Did someone say get defenseman Tom Poti? Too late! signed with the Islanders!Who’s left? It’s getting old!
July 8, 2006 at 6:31 pm
I think that McRibs has had enough chances. If his play doesn’t improve in big strides during the pre-season games, sent him to Hamilton not the press box. If he is left there until christmas or so , it just might be a wakeup call that he needs.
July 8, 2006 at 7:37 pm
The reason Gainey probably hasn’t overspent on free agents is that the salary cap probably won’t go up next season and Rivet, Souray and Markov are ALL UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENTS at the end of the upcoming season. He wants enough money to re-sign at least Rivet and Markov, who’s has the talent to be one of the top 10 defencemen in the league.
Although I hate Ribeiro and I think he’s a joke with a terrible self-centered attitude Gainey probably brought him back as an insurance policy in case Koivu dosen’t return.
We have an absolute ton of prospects coming up on offence and our defence is fine. Huet needs to prove he wasn’t a fluke.
There will be teams like Philly and New Jersey looking to dump salary and quality players for dirt cheap before and during the season so don’t get your panties in a nought.
As for all you people that think you can package Bonk and Zednik for a player like Lecavalier, GET YOUR HEAD CHECKED. Bonk will be here till his contract runs out because it’s massive for a player of his calibre and Zednik won’t fetch much on his own.
Still need a second line centre, that will have to come through a trade.
July 9, 2006 at 10:54 am
Habs#1: who are ALL these tons of offensive prospects? Get your head on straight! THERE ARE NONE! Why else do you think we are in this panicked state?Also, our defence is not that great! Check out the type of goals scored on us during the playoffs. We need players, now! Our system of players has dried up! If we had such great players in our system, we would be talking about them, and they probably would be in the NHL by now. I hope you aren’t thinking of Perohzogin, or Latendresse, or Plekanac! How many goals did the 2 of them score? Be realistic! Stop looking thru rose colored glasses! Gainey has never done anything now, or previous years to get free agents. Players don’t want to play here, and only if we are lucky enough to make some trades, will this franchise ever amount to much!This team is mediocre at best!
July 9, 2006 at 11:40 am
Canadiac you’re an idiot! The Kotstytsin bros. are going to light it up when they make it full time in the NHL. Alexei Yemelin is going to be a top flight offensive defenceman and Kyle Chipchura is going to be a 20 goal energy player. As for Plakanec and Perezhogin, give them some time! Eric Stall only had 36 points in his rookie season so sit down and shut up! If you were the G.M. of the Habs you probably would have given Shanahan, at 37 years old, a 5 year deal worth 30 million wouldn’t you.
This team may never get another big name free agent so shut your mouth and let Gainey do his job. How many Stanley Cups have you won as a G.M.?
And the Defence was our strong point in the playoffs along with Huet, it was the offence that sucked!
July 9, 2006 at 12:33 pm
TSN is reporting that Higgins has singed a one year deal and will make just over 600,000.
July 9, 2006 at 12:48 pm
Habs#1: obviously your mother never explained good manners to you! Don’t ever use that kind of language, you uneducated moron! I am entitled to my opinion, just like you! It’s just that, I am more intelligent, and have more wisdom than you! Don’t make this site ugly!
July 9, 2006 at 12:51 pm
Some people should not be allowed to be on this website, especially foul mouthed know it all idiots like habs #1! grow up and wash out your mouth!
July 9, 2006 at 1:10 pm
I agree with some of your comments, HABS #1, but cool it a little bit on the rhetoric, and language. After all, we all want whats best for the habs, and we all want them to do well. Let’s see what happens over the next few weeks. It’s just not worth getting so heated up , right?
July 9, 2006 at 6:30 pm
Apology accepted. Habs#1. I do love the Montreal Canadiens, for many years, goimg back to the 70′s, and I have tried to make comparisons, which isn’t fair, because nothing will compare to those teams! They were magnificent! You will never see a hockey team, with such great talent, the Habs of that era had!That’s why it’s hard to accept mediocrity! We’re spoiled, and we’re used to the best. I’m sure fans of that era will agree with me. I just want to see a fast paced, talent filled, team that I can be proud of! I’m sure you can understand that. I wish we could find a diamond in the rough, like a Guy Lafleur! Once once, in a while do players of that calibre come along, but I think Ovechkin, is one. Too bad, he’s not on our team. He’s a franchise player! That’s the kind of impact player we need.
July 9, 2006 at 7:34 pm
I still think Sergie Samsonov, Petr Sykora and Danny Markov should be on our list of “must sign” players.
All very young and still have a lot to offer.
July 9, 2006 at 8:04 pm
What a stupid, stupid move. Bob, what were you thinking?
July 9, 2006 at 10:03 pm
Great news for Habs fans. Ottawa’s second line won’t be the same. They’ve traded Havlat and Smolinksi to the Blackhawks and Havlat went back on his word and singed a three year 18 million dollar contract with them.
So much for testing the free agent market next season.
July 9, 2006 at 10:17 pm
theres nothing on the blackhawks or senators or even the NHL’s website about the havlat trade ?
July 9, 2006 at 11:11 pm
Just heard about trade of Havlat and Smolinski to Chicago. I’m sick! Why didn’t we make that trade? Havlat would have been a great addition to our team. Great player! Also Smolinski is an experienced Centerman. I don’t get it!Will Gainey ever make a trade? I’m getting worried!
July 10, 2006 at 9:14 pm
In case you watched CFCF tv sports tonight, Ron Reusch said what we have all been saying, for weeks. “It seems hockey players don’t seem to want to play in Montreal. Most of the FA’s were offered more money and more years on a contract, and turned it down. The comments by the french media to Saku Koivu, during the playoffs, asking if he was going to learn french, really had a negative effect on most players”. Thank you french media for killing our chances!So, unless we make trades,we have problems, big ones!
July 12, 2006 at 8:07 am
Candiac who cares. Still a Class orgainzation.If players DON’T want to play with us. There loss. The french media make hockey intersting in the city.When Montreal in on a roll there is no beter place to play.
July 12, 2006 at 2:26 pm
Habs#1 had agreat point above, despite what some seem to think the salary cap will likely not go up much after next season. The increase this year was because last season’s cap was set on the expectation that revenues would drop more than they actually did as compared to the pre-lockout season. But they still didn’t quite match those “old CBA” numbers (especially if you compare apples to apples). Even if revenues grow, it won’t be by as much as they over estimated the expected decline coming our of the lockout.