Sheldon Souray Domestic Dispute

TSN.CA is reporting Sheldon Souray was involved in a domestic dispute with his wife former Playboy model Angelica Bridges. Charges have not been pressed and Souray will be in the lineup tonight in Ottawa.

Related Bookmarks Tags

There are currently no tags for this post.

Leave a Comment

26 Comments

#1 Greg says:
October 27, 2005 at 1:55 pm

I wonder if they were fighting over Landsberg’s comments on “Off the Record” yesterday

#2 Habs Blog says:
October 27, 2005 at 1:56 pm

What were his comments?

#3 habscout says:
October 27, 2005 at 2:28 pm

Yes, please post any comments about the OTR show with Souray. I missed watching it, and am scouring the Habs message boards looking for someone who can discuss what was said.

#4 Shan says:
October 27, 2005 at 4:38 pm

Don’t believe everything you read guys.

#5 Nikki says:
October 28, 2005 at 12:33 am

Surfed across your page and the Sheldon Souray bit caught my eye. I heard about it today and have to say I wasn’t too surprised. I saw Sheldon out on quite a few nights in downtown montreal this summer. I don’t know about hockey players’ marital status but I can tell you I would’ve never thought he had a wife by the way he was behaving. Just a little girls’ perspective on it

#6 Habs Blog says:
October 28, 2005 at 8:21 am

I’ve heard the same thing. Actually I’ve seen photographic evidence of certain ‘things’…He was definitely not trying to be discrete..

#7 Habs Fan says:
October 29, 2005 at 3:10 pm

Yeah, I was reading the weekend paper and it was sating in the sports section that Souray and his wife are either getting divorced or are divorced. Then it said something like, Sheldon has said he doesn’t want to comment on the matter now. He will discuss it with the media at a later time when it isn’t so upsetting. It also said that it wasn’t a new thing.

#8 Angelika says:
November 2, 2005 at 3:27 am

DOES THAT MEAN HES AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET????????

#9 Angelika says:
November 2, 2005 at 3:29 am

I bet his wife is to blame for all this, she has posed in various man’s magazines, think about the harassment he got from other players on the ice!

#10 habs r the best says:
November 2, 2005 at 3:31 am

i agree. she needed to smarten up if she wanted to be wit him.

#11 guess if you want says:
November 7, 2005 at 12:13 pm

About time someone else says something other than “it’s his fault” we don’t know what happened…only two of them were there. Follow the story if you’re interested…you’ll find out what happened…mainly because the media will make sure we know every little sorted detail. PS..Hello JB!

#12 NB Habs fan says:
November 16, 2005 at 2:15 pm

Hmmm…too bad for everyone involved (Sheldon, Angelica, new baby). I hope there was nothing inapprpriate going on. That would be a shame for many reasons. i’d also hate to think one of my favorite Habs is a spineless woman beater.

#13 gotta say something says:
November 23, 2005 at 4:31 pm

First of all, I can’t believe that Montreal fans in the City are booing Sheldon when he touches the puck. How brutal. Do any of you know what happened? NOPE. What is going on? Think about the circumstances, does noone think that the entire situation is alittle fishy? Put 2 and 2 together…
I agree that woman beaters ARE spineless…but in this situation there is no woman beater.

#14 Habs Blog says:
November 23, 2005 at 4:33 pm

Don’t think anyone is booing him because of his personal life, but rather his poor play. I think he has a more severe injury then he’s letting be known, at least I hope – because if thats the top of his game were in trouble.

#15 KEVIN PAGE says:
November 24, 2005 at 12:14 am

THE GUY CANT PLAY THIS YEAR HE IS BETTER IN THE STANDS WITH BONK, DAGENAIS, AND DANIS. COME BACK WHEN YOU CAN PLAY AND STOP TAKING OUR MONEY

#16 Terri-Lynn says:
December 5, 2005 at 10:58 pm

I think that all the people that wrote on this site should be ashamed of themselves. For one it’s none of our business what is going on in Sheldon’s or his wife life. Two no one person is to blame for the failed marriage as they are both adults and there is probably more behind the story then anyone will ever know. I don’t think that when Sheldon was a young hockey player in Quesnel that it was his life goal to be known as a wife beater and as for his wife she probably doesn’t want to be known as the beated wife.

#17 Peshford says:
December 29, 2005 at 4:50 pm

# 15 KEVIN PAGE
Posted on November 24th, 2005 at 12:14 am. About ‘Sheldon Souray Domestic Dispute’.

THE GUY CANT PLAY THIS YEAR HE IS BETTER IN THE STANDS WITH BONK, DAGENAIS, AND DANIS. COME BACK WHEN YOU CAN PLAY AND STOP TAKING OUR MONEY

—

dagenais is scoring goals and always comes thru on the shootout…
i dont know why hes getting flack

as for Souray
who cares about his personal life.. thats his business..
go read the national enquirer
scallywags

#18 CCSS says:
December 30, 2005 at 1:42 am

His personal life is no ones business, talk about his game all ya want. Put yourself in his shoes and see what you have to say then, it has been proven that the police report was B.S. and other reports that were made to the newspapers. Hollywood drama… some like to make there own when they arent getting paid to act in front of a camera or just want more money and a sob story out of a divorce! Lots of people do stupid stuff when they are hurt its between them leave it that way and get a hobby!

#19 Michele says:
January 7, 2006 at 7:48 pm

It’s unfortunate for Sheldon that his marriage has failed. However what is more unfortunate, is that he has to be judged by the fans, press, and anyone who thinks their opinion counts for something. He needs to be left alone to work his way through this – it must hurt – regardless of the circumstances leading up to the separation – it takes two people to stay married or not! Leave him alone and let him live his personal life outside of the press.

#20 Shane Pepin says:
February 7, 2006 at 3:52 pm

Souray kicks all you guy’s *** o shut it

#21 Charlene says:
December 5, 2006 at 5:50 pm

Well, all I have to say is…I don’t care if he beats his wife or not, I really don’t care about his personal life, what I do care is can he play, and my answer is yes he can. He is the best defenceman in the rooster right now. And just to make things clear, and yes I still think he’s hot

#22 habsalltheway10 says:
January 31, 2007 at 4:34 pm

Its so easy to say things when you don’t really know what’s going on… gossip is the root of sooooo much evil… imagine this was you. Let’s just mind our own business and evaluate a hockey player for what they do on the ice and how much they try when given the opportunity. Sure he’s had a tough couple of years but so have many, many other players in the league. Management have given him room to grow and look at the results now. No one player in the league can really constantly be blamed or take credit for winning and losing games (unless your a really, really bad goalie, lol…).

I’d prefer to keep hoping for the best for the team and mind my business with the rest!

#23 codeeeey says:
February 5, 2007 at 1:42 am

**** all you people who hate sheldon souray…..best offensive defencmen in the nhl today and he’s a goos fighter too

#24 kathy says:
February 8, 2007 at 4:53 pm

he s hot thats it thats all!!!!!

Leave a Comment

ShoutBox

Last Message 8 minutes ago

Avatar37 and 3 guests are online. Google is crawling the site.

Avatar37 : pressure playing in Montreal, since he has problems with the expectations in Washington and Montreal isn't any easier. Then again, the media were very easy on Kovalev, so maybe it's a Russian thing? No idea. Anyway, yeah, it would have to be an established star that gives us an immediate drastic upgrade at forward, that's the only way I'd trade PK, because we'd be giving up a potential QB on our blueline for the next decade.
Avatar37 : Goalie - Sure, the only player I'd say who is untradeable (meaning I wouldn't trade no matter what) is Carey Price. You build a winning team from the net out, and I don't think there's a better goalie for his age in the NHL than Price, so I wouldn't trade him. Otherwise, every player would be open for offers, but for PK Subban, it would take (for me) an already established star, like Carter or Crosby or Ovechkin. As much as I like Ovechkin, I'm not sure he could handle all the media pre
goalie : I'm not suggesting at all that we judst dump or get rid of PK. I do however believe that he is a very valued commodity in the NHL adn that the Habs will receive offers for his services. If someone ffers us young, strong, puck handling forwards who can score, I think the Habs have to look at that possible trade.
Avatar37 : Agreed. It would be a big mistake to trade PK just to move up 2 spots in the draft. PK, Emelin, and Gorges are the bright future of our defense.
Senet1 : I am with you Avatar, Subban stays, it is not often that you get a stud defenceman who can play 25+ minutes. The mistakes he makes are for the most part not that serious and people forget he is only 23 and been in the league 2 years. He has come a long way in those two years. He has offense, defence and he hits. You cannot bet much better than that. Two more years experience and he has a shot at the Norris. If Markov does anything I hope he teaches PK how to work the PP.
Avatar37 : «link»
Avatar37 : go.
Avatar37 : round exit. Heck, even the year they won the cup we almost took them out in round 1. I believe in the corps of this team, I really think we just need a few tweaks. Adding Larry Robinson to run the defense would be a BIG help, keep Cunneyworth as offensive coach, and get a head coach who can get these guys back on the right path. We need to establish an identity again, a team that won't let itself be pushed around like it was under Martin. A few scrappers on this team and we'll be good to
Avatar37 : Yeah, the only way I'd trade PK is if we were getting an established star in return, like Carter or Crosby. I don't think we're miles away from competing deep into the playoffs, the NHL has become so competitive because of the salary cap that really there aren't huge differences between the teams. Add into the equation the stupid scoring system (some games worth 2 points, some 3) that the standings don't truly reflect where teams should really be. Look at Boston, cup winners to first rou
Senet1 : It would have to be something pretty special before I would trade PK. To me he is the #1 building block of our defence. I would trade any other defenceman we have before I would trade PK.
Senet1 : An improvement in our offense and strengthening our defence. Personally, I do not think we are that far off, five players at best could get us there. One thing that has always been true about the playoffs, Defence wins and you need a strong 3rd and 4th line.
goalie : I'm more optimistic now about the Habs than I have been for the past three dreadfully long seasons!
goalie : 2: I think GM Bergevin will make somewhat of a 'blockbuster't rade either before or on the day of the draft adn I believe PK Subban will be in that package. WE have t rememebr we have to give away some talent to get back other talent. No one wants players like Moen to move up in the draft etc.
goalie : Some thoughts:The more I see the playoffs it becomes even more obvious that we're miles away from being able to 'compete' dep into the playoffs
Avatar37 : «link»
Senet1 : Young Subban might also be an option if the Russian goalie is not available. However, to me I would wait another year and attempt to use my draft 2nd round draft picks to improve out forward situation.
Senet1 : Although Rinne contact is another example of long term at the wrong time. He is 29 years old. A case could be made with Price that double his money now with bonuses if we win the cup, I think that is still allowed in contracts?
Senet1 : Problem is he is going to want Pekka Rinne money and term. That is closer to 7M. On the other hand, the contract could have step up clauses in it over the 7 years.
Avatar37 : With Price, I wouldn't blink twice about offering him a 7 year contract now, especially if he'd be willing to give up dollar value for length. 7 years at $5.5 million a year would be just fine in my book.
Avatar37 : I think the goaltending void in our current system would push me to draft Vasilevski with our second pick, if he was available. He's young and has lots of potential, but is at least 5-6 years away from starting to be ready to play on an NHL roster.
Senet1 : Long tern contracts are a risk, but if you have a super star not as much. Luongo's contract was long term but signed too late in his career.
Avatar37 : Senet - Yes, you were clear in your post, my question was directed at goalie. I'm with you in that I'd be willing to sign him to a 7 year contract. I'd be nervous about anything longer, because every single long term goalie contract I can think of turned out to be a disaster for the team signing it.
Senet1 : I think that Budaj is a better goalie than many give him credit for, is he a Price no but with a tight defence he could be a good goalie. Many teams have average goalies but have great defence and still win. Look at Detroit, for years they have had average goaltending, but won cups. Goalies can get on a roll in the playoffs, look at Huet as an example, he was not really a good goalie but played great in the playoffs, next year he was a wash. Defence makes the goalie a winner, just ask Price.
Senet1 : Having a young equivalent goalie in the system right now is not important, three years from now it will be, so we have three years to make that kind of move in the draft. I think we have more pressing needs aat the moment.
Senet1 : Personally, I do not see this as a negative because of Price's age, you wait to draft a goalie of a Patrick Roy or Brodeur some teams wait a life time. To me we have on so why would we want to not play that out for as long as we can. Bottom line is this, regardless, right now you have a stud goalie, you are either going to pay him the money he deserves for not sign him and lose him. There is no middle of the road here.
goalie : Avatar made a great point. We don't have an NHL or up adn coming NHL goalies in our system. Another great move by Gauthier. Price is sitting very pretty.
goalie : WEll Price has us by the nads. I guess I'd have to go as far as a 7 year contract due to his play adn his age.
Senet1 : Luongo is now 33, he has been a good goaltender for a number of years. I would sign Price for 7 years and at age 31 then we deal with UFA at that time. Hopefully, we could provide him with another 5 years at that time. That is my opinion anyway, I would never risk losing him as a UFA at this point in his career to me that would be a very poor management decision. Even a 10 year contract would put him only at 34 years old. If you are going to sign him to long term now is the time.
Senet1 : If you have a young stud you have to gamble a little and give him a contract that is worthy of his abilities and his potential. It can have escalation clauses or reducing clauses like Kovalchuk's contract.
Senet1 : Avatar, I thought I was clear Yes I would sign him long term. My previous post said. The problem is if you have a out in the contract after 5 years then the player also has an out after 5 years. So no self respected lawyer would accept a contract that did not have equal escape clauses. So no I would not sign only for 5 years, if Price was 28 years old yes but not a 24. Seven years still only makes him 31 when the contract is over. If you have a young stud you have to gamble a little and give him
Avatar37 : Cammalleri trade. Given the fact that we have no NHL starting quality goaltenders in the system currently, aren't we held hostage to having to sign Price?
Avatar37 : There are many bad goalie contracts, just look at Huet. However, your post didn't answer my question as to what you'd do with Price. He's an RFA now, but for argument sake, if he were a UFA, what would you do? If he wanted a 7+ year contract, you know some other team would give him one. Would you risk losing him for nothing because you didn't want to sign a contract over 5 years? And if we lose Price, our goalies are Budaj and Robert Mayer, as we sent Karri Ramo to the Flames in the Cam
goalie : .. a 5 years contract again based upon the experience he has had AND he likes Bobby Lou!
goalie : Ditto for Philly, Ther goaltender 'situations' have both become the number 1 story line for both teams, and in Vancouver one could see the exaspiration on Gillis' adn to some extent Vigneault's faces when continously being bombarded by the loooong term contract that the Canucks are stuct with. (Gillis even said last February or so, thank goodness it looks like more than few other teams will be looking for a starting goaltender for 2012-13. He said he would never again do more than a 5 year c
goalie : I've spent the past four winters in BC thus I am very aware of the Canucks situations. I'd first say I give Gillis adn Vigneault 100% credit for being VERY supportive of Roberto L. even when Corey Schenider has vastly out played him. (I too like Bobby Lou but facts are facts).